have the discussions, productive discussions wet in the intervening week. i want to thank the three co sponsors, supervisor kim, supervisor mandelman and supervisor brown. i would respectfully that one of you move to accept the consensual language that is before you that i previously described and just send this as a committee report to the full board with recommendation. thank you, supervisor peskin. of course, thank you to everyone who came out on this important issue. i ve certainly learned a lot in the last week. there s still so much more to learn. i appreciate everyone shedding light on this issue. we share co common goals. maybe we disagree about how we ll get there. unfortunately, and again, i m not an expert that can jump in and say i think this is the best way to do it. with that said i am glad that there has been some finessing of this language. it s important that the p.u.c. is able to remain as part of the these negotiations and you would what is best for the c
need as much storage as possible. to protect the fish and those of us using this water. finally as some of you remember, six years ago, there was a ballot measured to tear down ocean a see damn. dam. remember what the voters said about that proposal? 77% rejected it. this state proposal would have the same or more devastating impact because it would not allow the sfpuc the ability to adequately store enough water for the fish or the users. please keep this in mind. thank you for your listening. thank you, very much. welcome back to chamber. any other members of the public who wish to comment on this item? please come on up. good afternoon, my name is wanda and i m a community activist. i also have a strong interest in workforce development and also leadership in the newer a. i just want to make a comment. i would like for people to reconsider what the sfpuc is offering. i think it s important, not just for people, such as these young people who have come from district 10
scheduled this not once but twice. we were quite willing last week to create that time and space to have the discussions, productive discussions wet in the intervening week. i want to thank the three co sponsors, supervisor kim, supervisor mandelman and supervisor brown. i would respectfully that one of you move to accept the consensual language that is before you that i previously described and just send this as a committee report to the full board with recommendation. thank you, supervisor peskin. of course, thank you to everyone who came out on this important issue. i ve certainly learned a lot in the last week. there s still so much more to learn. i appreciate everyone shedding light on this issue. we share co common goals. maybe we disagree about how we ll get there. unfortunately, and again, i m not an expert that can jump in and say i think this is the best way to do it. with that said i am glad that there has been some finessing of this language. it s important that
as a result the goal of the plan of maintaining the diversity of residents here in terms of socioeconomic makeup appears empty. cities across the u.s. and even canada are learning that developers are not placing housing units to be used for housing people. many cities are fully realizing the negative impacts of the push to build, build, build an ideology fully embraced by the central soma plan. they show it later it is later developed as a commodity and it is corporatized. often new condos are not being occupied by local residents are any people at all. without adequate patrols and controls and things in place, they will continue to not be used as open and accessible affordable housing options. new condos will be affordable only as high-end luxury housing or city are staying vacant because they are owned by investors who have no intention of living in these units. new condos will be used as commercial short-term rentals instead of as residential use. condos will be
it was asked which things were important to you and you can see protect and restore the bay, protect and restore is above affordable housing. this is a call state fullerton survey of san francisco voters. it s remarkable to me. the second point is, if i get there, is just to point out, that this is a good popular subject that does well with voters. the l.a. mayor, in 2014, said l.a. will reduce its water imports to 50% of its supply. and then in 2017, not a causal relationship but he won by 81%. the point here is he an astute politician who understand his con at thiconstituents and san o strong support the environment. thank you. good afternoon, jackie flynn of the institute san francisco. i d like to ask all my community members to please stand up. i m here because i like to express concern with the current bay-delta plan. we re here not in support of the current resolution. we have folks that have survived unemployment from small contractors that hire locally and hire f