The memo went out from the White House that there’s no evidence President Joe Biden did anything wrong regarding his son’s business dealings and, sure enoug
About sondland s testimony, that he was not even as interested in the investigations as the announcement of the investigations. that is meaning that it is not about the corruption, but the re-election of the campaign. and what about do you think about that, charlie, announcing investigations without necessarily carrying it out? i have written that is a crucial nuance in the constellation of evidence here. it is going to how do you interpret president trump s motive. was he genuinely thinking that this particular company in ukraine really needed someone to look at it to make sure that nothing bad happened or looking for a public basis by which he could say joe biden is corrupt, corrupt, and corrupt, corrupt, corrupt and biden, biden and the way he said crooked hillary the way he did a million times in the 2016 election. the counter e part of that is
For something. i know lawyers, people like the judge, napolitano, they say it does. i m here to say it doesn t look good. he could probably find another place and one that just doesn t stick this back in people s faces. yeah, let s forget for a moment about the emoluments clause or whether it s constitutional or legal or even ethical. when mick mulvaney said we searched around and this is the best place we could find, of all the square miles in the united states of america and all of the places that you could have held a g-7 summit, they settle on a trump property in miami, it doesn t pass the sniff test. while most republicans won t care, you re right. it looks a little silly, especially when he s telling everybody joe biden is corrupt, hunter biden is corrupt. here he is having this meeting here at his own property, whether they re doing it at cost