11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state. it really is, i mean, it s o outrageous. every time i hear that, this is one of the most dangerous investigations facing trump. do you think he will face consequences for attempting to put his finger on the scale. year and a half later that phone call is hard to listen to. he held himself together and did what georgians elected him to do. we got a lot of work to do in my party to fix the rules of engagement to talk about real issues. real issues are not conspiracy theories be they are not
illuminated hypocrisy. being from d.c. and the washington post that broke the story made it more important. one of the few papers in a newspaper where you can tell where it is. herb lock had a great deal to do with nixon coming down. he had a lot of people that would complain to him, that was jo outrageous, he had one answer every time, he d say, but it s true. franklin. i can call you franklin. years ago, it was frowned upon then to make fun of the people running the country. they won t let anyone talk politics in here because this stadium was dedicated to art, sports, and any useful enterprises. now, mr. nixon won easily, and he wasn t campaigning, which shows you how well a politician can do if he keeps his mouth
it s been reported that giuliani was telling the paper he pushed pompeo, the secretary of state, to support her removal by threatening his standing with the president, saying i believe he should know the president s orders to fire her were being blocked by the state department. does it worry you how much influence somebody not in the administration could have on a top official like the ambassador? definitely. i mean, the fact that rudy giuliani has been promoting these repeatedly debunked stories coming out of ukraine, including this whole idea that the server for crowdstrike somehow was in ukraine itself is outrageous, but to actually use this as part of a case against a very possible u.s. ambassador who was representing the u.s. well, totally bipartisan in her approach to the job, is o outrageous. and secretary pompeo s role in this is looking suspect as well. particularly when he s basing his decision on hearsay and
comments are piggish and they are disgusting and he should be embarrassed for himself. what he s suggesting is if a woman participates in pornography somehow they re not entitled to respect and somehow they re not entitled to believe in something they state. that somehow they ve lost credibility. and, you know, don, i don t know the facts and the circumstances around this, but i know for a fact that at one point in time the first lady which when he came to the united states engaged in modsling and may have engaged in some scantily clad photographs. there s nothing wrong with that. that doesn t mean she s not entitled to our respect, not entitled to credibility. no one would ever say that about mrs. trump because it would be o outrageous. and yet somehow rudy giuliani believes my client isn t entitled to be believed because
families or looked at our president meeting with mr. putin. mr. strzok, you are before this committee for one reason to serve as a monumental distraction. they need to identify a villain. mr. strzok, tag, you re it. laura: no, you re it. all these games, hijinks, games, circus. stay with me here. the hearing went from circus lights to a side show. i talked to agents around the country. you ve embarrassed them and yourself and i can t help but wonder when i see you looking there with a smirk how many times did you look so innocent into your wife s eyes and lie to her about mr. chairman, it s o outrageous! mr. chairman! laura: well, i understand the