assassination, they have in fact covered a great deal of information related to sensitive intelligence activities during the height of the cold war. now, jfk-ologists, historians, congress members who are worried that not releasing this information is damaging in american faith and institutions, they re saying this is ridiculous. like, what sources and methods do we need to protect from the 1960s? intelligence agencies say, look, no, like, we are in fact genuinely worried about this, they re arguing to hold this back. it is possible that there is a cia agent, dating from the 190s still alive. but those familiar with this universe of documents, they will tell you that the chances that there is going to be a smoking gun in here that will change the official narrative, pretty small. so i think i might know the answer to this question, but, i mean, is this going to satisfy people who want to know what s going on here? yeah, it is a good question. look, trump released tens of thousands