democrats. laura: you neededted democrats, they don t have enough republicans, they needed the democrat votes. why wouldn t they support this? they re going to support it. we have to get to bolton. this is huge news, i m sorry. john bolton is replacing h.r. mcmaster today, and my goodness, msnbc and others are in a total meltdown, world war 3 is about to happen. john bolton is known as a hard liner. clearly different than others in the administration now, on the iran agreement for example. and it points to dangerous signals. millions of voters voted against in 2016, voted against stupid wars and bringing the biggest hawk there s ever been and put him as head of national security is awful. john bolton, he is the hammer and everything is a nail. laura: i love that phrase. come on, richard, the idea that bolton is going to order trump
don t recall instead of giving long, long answers. because the one thing they re trying to get him on, is perjury. and there s no defense against that. perjury is one of those specified in the constitution for impeachment. that s the one issue that has to be avoided at all costs. laura: full dills closure, i worked for bob bennett imyears ago, not on that case. harmit, the big swirling controversy, oh no lawyer wants to work for donald trump. first of all, a lot of law firms, big law firms, don t like getting involved in these political matterstor a variety of reasons, everything is toxic. but this this is what the former acting solicitor general for obama said today. i represented bin laden s driver. but i would have trouble representing donald trump. the reason for that is very simple, which is, you know, the guy doesn t believe in the rule
balancing the budget or bringing jobs back, yeah, as you put it, konld donald trump knew how to win it lex. he said things that everybody who knew policy knew he koornlt deliver on. laura: i don t agree with you. you can build a wall. we can put a man on the moon, we can do all of the innovation technology, i think america could solve pretty much any big problem ahead of it. if it wants to. but in washington, richard, it s both republicans and democrats, i m not letting democrats off the hook, they re big spenders, too. they just want to keep it going. the lobbyists get paid, the lawyers get the money. i m former lawyer, believe me, it s nice to charge $700 an hour. the american people demand real accountability. what bang are we getting for the buck, is it going to make the millenials safer and prosperous and happier? congressman chime, in but the democrats didn t get everything they want, republicans, no one
your company, then we re going to tax you more. laura: i don t think he understands what he s saying there. what should the maximum wage be, congressman? ellison didn t spell it out. but he did suggest that $300 on hour might be enough for, say, the ceo of mcdonald s. the idea of a maximum page, while it doesn t have wide appeal and safe to say. but one of ellison s high profile friends might support it as way to get back at the people really running american business. let the conspiracy theorys begin. everywhere, they take on the language, the culture. but they run the money. they run the business. when there s a jewish holiday everything gets silent. laura: if only screwy louie
your company, then we re going to tax you more. laura: i don t think he understands what he s saying there. what should the maximum wage be, congressman? ellison didn t spell it out. but he did suggest that $300 on hour might be enough for, say, the ceo of mcdonald s. the idea of a maximum page, while it doesn t have wide appeal and safe to say. but one of ellison s high profile friends might support it as way to get back at the people really running american business. let the conspiracy theorys begin. everywhere, they take on the language, the culture. but they run the money. they run the business. when there s a jewish holiday everything gets silent.