Somebody. By somebody. He was the first da to investigate Jerry Sandusky, could there be a link between that case and his disappearance . Where is this man . Somebody knows something or a lot of somebodys do. Hello and welcome to dateline. Ray gricar was a District Attorney and bellefont, pennsylvania. Not far from Penn State University. He was the first to investigate allegations against Jerry Sandusky who abused the child. That was long before the scandal made headlines. But several years later, ray gricar mysteriously disappeared. The strange turn of events left people asking, was there a connection . Here is lester holt with the case of The Missing Da. The clues are tantalizing, as sporty red car, a speck of cigarette ash. A battered hard drive. It is a mystery, it absolutely is a mystery. But what do these clues say about the sudden disappearance of a District Attorney who left them behind . It is baffling, it is confusing and perplexing it is all of those things. His name is ray
was that statement at least grounds for further investigation? have you tried to get into ray gricar head to try to understand what his thinking may have been when this allegation was presented in office? it s easy for me with 2020 hindsight to say, well if i had that information, i would ve, said this needs to be looked into further. but, that must always follow with i don t know what information that he had. we ray gricar decided not to prosecute. we do not know his reasons. it is easy now to second guess ray gricar decision. especially since jerry sandusky went on to commit repeated assaults after 1998. in 2012, jerry sandusky curry was convicted of 45 counts of child sex abuse. for those of you that say that ray gricar miss the opportunity to put jerry sandusky away, you say what? i say they do not know the law. they do not know ray gricar. there were online posts, and tweets speculating about a link between the two. because there actually be a connection? for anybo
admission. but it has to be an admission to a crime. hugging, even of itself, even in a child under the age of 12. is not necessarily a crime. unless you can show sexual gratification. that is the key. was that statement at least grounds for further investigation? have you tried to get into ray gricar head to try to understand what his thinking may have been when this allegation was presented in office? it s easy for me with 2020 hindsight to say, well if i had that information, i would ve, said this needs to be looked into further. but, that must always follow with i don t know what information that he had. we ray gricar decided not to prosecute. we do not know his reasons. it is easy now to second guess ray gricar decision. especially since jerry sandusky went on to commit repeated assaults after 1998. in 2012, jerry sandusky curry was convicted of 45 counts of child sex abuse. for those of you that say