want him back . they ve seen the difference. it iss envy that is drivingth the gop establishment run. no, you re right where.p you are not coming back next week. esta good to see you both. that s all the time we have left. thank you for being with us..yo thank you for making the show . ssible please dvr so you never miss an episode in the meantime, let not your heart be trouble. laura ingraham the angle is b next . tro have a atub nightled, see monda i m laura ingraham. the ingram angle from a washington on edge tonight . now i m going to say this very bluntly what theirtl refusal to forthright unequivocally condemn this terrorist attackiv pics of their activist democrat base. the democrat the white house. they re putting the lives of supreme court justicesn in jeopardy. jeopar yes.dy i mean it is in jeopardy nowty a party has spent the past,
said all along. no collusion, no collusion. i hope that s true. if it is, go in front of robert mueller, answer all the questions, let s put this behind us so you can focus on the midterm election. he sometimes tends to embellish things, and there are a lot of questions he won t want to answer, or he ll answer them in the way he wants to, and he runs the risk of getting sbi legal jeopar into legal jeopardy, and that s dangerous. it s best just to get over it. both personal, constitutional and criminal. his legal team needs to understand that and separate themselves. that is to say, in the white house, the white house counsel does not work for donald trump. he works for the president of the united states. so his job is to forestall impeachment. his private attorneys need to
taking place on domestic issues with the trump administration and the president s inner circle. steve bannon removed from the national security council. you were adamant about that happening. steve bannon will not be serving on the nsc and call upon donald trump to remove him from the white house. you saw the images of steve bannon in the room during the top folks within the trump administration dealing with the crisis in syria. launching tomahawk missiles. do you think he is really in jeopar jeopardy? is he really a security expert? is he someone that has the deep experience that you need to have with some of the generals or folks with the intelligence community that need to sit in the national security council? is he really an expert in the field? i don t think so. when you bring someone that has no experience to an important council such national security council and they begin to push the muscle around, i think that