a warning for trump judge tanya chutkan makes clear the ex presidents free speech is not absolute in his upcoming election interference case. plus, on ethical and possibly illegal clarence thomas exception of luxury gifts and travel might finally force the court to take action. and, breaking developments in the georgia election probe, our strongest indication yet that a grand jury could indict donald trump in a matter of days. i am ayman mohyeldin, lets get started. and we begin with that breaking news out of georgia this hour, fulton county s da fani willis will begin presenting her election interference case against donald trump and his allies to a grand jury early next week. the atlanta journal-constitution is reporting the timeline came into sharper focus when former georgia lieutenant governor jeff duncan and independent journalist george chidi separately confirmed they had received notifications they will testify on tuesday. now, this means the public might know by tu
illegal clarence thomas exception of luxury gifts and travel might finally force the court to take action. and, breaking developments in the georgia election probe, our strongest indication yet that a grand jury could indict donald trump in a matter of days. i am ayman mohyeldin lets, get started. and we begin with that breaking news out of georgia this hour, fulton county s returning fani willis will begin presenting her election interference case against donald trump and his allies to a grand jury early next week. the atlanta journal-constitution is reporting the timeline came into sharper focus when former georgia lieutenant governor jeff duncan and independent journalist george shady separately confirmed they had received notifications they will testify on tuesday. now, this means the public might know by tuesday whether jurors indict the ex president. tuesday evening, to be specific. willis is expected to begin her presentation to grandeurs on monday. we re gonna have
glimpse into the defenses lawyers will make on the stand. here is jonna lauro on meet the press. the defense is quite simple. donald trump, president trump, believed in his heart of hearts that he had won that election. and as any american citizen, he had a right to speak out under the first amendment. he had a right to petition governments around the country, state governments. based on his grievances that election irregularities had occurred. he had every right to speak about the important issues that were taking place after the election. a technical violation of the constitution is not a violation of criminal law. that is just plain wrong. except a technical violation of the constitution by definition is still a violation of the constitution. the constitution, in six different places, opposes insurrection and our constitution is designed to stop people from trying to overthrow elections, and trying to overthrow the government. moments later, democratic congressman jami
lawyers will make on the stand. here is jonna lauro on meet the press. the defense is quite simple. donald trump, president trump, believed in his heart of hearts that he had won that election. and as any american citizen, he had a right to speak out under the first amendment. he had a right to petition governments around the country, state governments. based on his grievances that election irregularities had occurred. he had every right to speak about the important issues that were taking place after the election. a technical violation of the constitution is not a violation of criminal law. that is just plain wrong. except a technical violation of the constitution by definition is still a violation of the constitution. the constitution, in six different places, opposes insurrection and our constitution is designed to stop people from trying to overthrow elections, and trying to overthrow the government. moments later, democratic congressman jamie raskin responded to laur
in his possession. two sources telling cnn this quote, you attorneys for donald trump turned over material in mid march. in response to a federal subpoena related to a classified u.s. military document. described by the former president an tape in 2021. but were unable to find the document itself. that s that subpoena from jack smith came after the special counsel s team questioned the trump aide before a federal grand jury about the tape. in which trump expresses his frustrations with general mark milly, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. more from that reporting, quote, prosecutors sought any and all documents and materials related to mark mill lane iran including maps or invasion plans, sources say. the sources also say that prosecutors made clear to trump s attorneys after issuing the subpoena that they specifically wanted the iran document he talked about on tape. as well as any material referencing classified information. things like meeting notes, audio recor