that if you are shooting someone if you kill someone because of their race, you can be held accountable in the federal court. let me let jeffrey weigh in on this as well. go ahead, jeffrey. what is interesting about how the prosecutors approached the case in georgia, the state case, they stayed away from the racial issue. they did not portray this as a racially motivated crime, they didn t argue that it was a racially motivated crime. they didn t present all the evidence that they had with regard to racial animus on the part of the three defendants. that was a strategic decision they made and it obviously paid off since they won the case that they brought. but the question is, you know, is it important for society to have a trial that where the prosecutors argue, look, it is a separate and additional and important crime when you commit
i don t know he knows what s coming. dems are definitely going to follow money trail, you re absolutely right. that s something that the tentacles are there, and they want to find out what s what, and that s going to happen in this in this new congress. let me let jeffrey weigh in. i hear a lot more talk about impeachment from us in the news media than i do from members of congress. trump loves talking impeachment. they rarely recognize that they don t want to make the mistake that republicans made in 1998 to push impeachment when it s not going to go anywhere. as they pointed out, getting the bank records of dyceutsche bank and see where the money was coming and going. but there are democratic members of the house who are talking about impeachment, brad sherman, adam schiff, and a whole bunch of others. we ll continue to talk about it
concerned. she wound up many hours later not guilty, an acquittal. how unusual is that to go all the way from second degree murder, forget about that, forget about manslaughter and wind up not guilty? it doesn t happen often but it s not rare. many times once a juror gets back into the jury room, they are going to be persuaded by the other jurors, and that s especially true if most of them are on the other side. that s why jury selection is so incredibly important. when you had this particular jury, this composition of folks, i think the verdict that came out, not guilty, was in some ways but remember, page, and let me let jeffrey weigh in on this as well, when they first went into that room after all the hours and hours of testimony, it was basically 3-3, 3 for not guilty but two a guilty for manslaughter, one guilty, this woman who spoke to abc, of second degree murder. so the debate was only