Conditions that the on proval is outlined it is that it is. I am happy to answer the questions if you have them. In regards to the exposed stainless steel systems it is a standard condition of approval to ask for a painted finished metals within this district as a predominant character defining feature, bound from the district. Thank you, commissioner baoerl pearlman. I had written down exactly the question that the project sponsor had asked about the stainless steel and it does differentiate it from the condition on the building and it is also, set back in under, you know the building and thes set back and so, in terms of that condition, do we want to make it different or exactly the same as indicating that we dont want to do anything false . All right. Mr. Fry . Department staff, and our intent has always been to match the finishes that are the predominant character, and we would suggest to i simplify that. And so that we know that it is a modern intersvensing and we are consistent w
Set back and so, in terms of that condition, do we want to make it different or exactly the same as indicating that we dont want to do anything false . All right. Mr. Fry . Department staff, and our intent has always been to match the finishes that are the predominant character, and we would suggest to i simplify that. And so that we know that it is a modern intersvensing and we are consistent with requiring these weatherized or painted finishes because historically there was very little exposed metal within these districts. I have another question. It is a design question about on the battery street side, where it appears that prior to 1961, i think that was the date, that the corness would have been intact and now, the new design, you know, it looks as if, from the photographs, being used to get a truck in and so they just kind of cut up into the corness and if you go around to the side and there is an entrance where it is complete and if you look at the original drawing, it also i m
Thank you, commissioner baoerl pearlman. I had written down exactly the question that the project sponsor had asked about the stainless steel and it does differentiate it from the condition on the building and it is also, set back in under, you know the building and thes set back and so, in terms of that condition, do we want to make it different or exactly the same as indicating that we dont want to do anything false . All right. Mr. Fry . Department staff, and our intent has always been to match the finishes that are the predominant character, and we would suggest to i simplify that. And so that we know that it is a modern intersvensing and we are consistent with requiring these weatherized or painted finishes because historically there was very little exposed metal within these districts. I have another question. It is a design question about on the battery street side, where it appears that prior to 1961, i think that was the date, that the corness would have been intact and now, t
Conditions that the on proval is outlined it is that it is. I am happy to answer the questions if you have them. In regards to the exposed stainless steel systems it is a standard condition of approval to ask for a painted finished metals within this district as a predominant character defining feature, bound from the district. Thank you, commissioner baoerl pearlman. I had written down exactly the question that the project sponsor had asked about the stainless steel and it does differentiate it from the condition on the building and it is also, set back in under, you know the building and thes set back and so, in terms of that condition, do we want to make it different or exactly the same as indicating that we dont want to do anything false . All right. Mr. Fry . Department staff, and our intent has always been to match the finishes that are the predominant character, and we would suggest to i simplify that. And so that we know that it is a modern intersvensing and we are consistent w
Sponsor had asked about the stainless steel and it does differentiate it from the condition on the building and it is also, set back in under, you know the building and thes set back and so, in terms of that condition, do we want to make it different or exactly the same as indicating that we dont want to do anything false . All right. Mr. Fry . Department staff, and our intent has always been to match the finishes that are the predominant character, and we would suggest to i simplify that. And so that we know that it is a modern intersvensing and we are consistent with requiring these weatherized or painted finishes because historically there was very little exposed metal within these districts. I have another question. It is a design question about on the battery street side, where it appears that prior to 1961, i think that was the date, that the corness would have been intact and now, the new design, you know, it looks as if, from the photographs, being used to get a truck in and so