To read it first. to be able to fully understand what they are talking about. it is something that, you know, just based on the information that we do know, i have a lot of questions about it. i certainly have questions about whether this is something that is gonna get moved to federal court. i have read the decision from judge heller denying the removal from manhattan case. and when you read that and you then apply the exact same reasoning to georgia, it seems like a pretty rock solid case to remove. so that is one thing to consider. the other thing to. consider is that a lot of what has been reported, the that fani willis was looking, yet it seems to be outside of her jurisdiction. you know, she is a county district attorney, she does not have jurisdiction in the state house. she does not have jurisdiction in other counties. right now calls to the secretary of state, things like that. that s something that the attorney general of the state of georgia is one who always
Meadows was not a coconspirator in the federal indictment, that he was cooperating. so there is interesting indeed let s mark meadows is indicted in this state indictment. yes, and he was the one that with georgia particular, jake, he was the one that went down, he was making phone calls to georgia, officials. he was the one that went down to georgia to visit an election audit site. he was the one who was on the phone when trump called brad raffensperger in that form is called to be days go, before january 6th. he was actually in the room with trump, and listening in another room switchboard calling him in. he is someone that georgia officials, when you talk to him ranging a lot of the calls, a big part of this. someone fought testifying in this aspect to others when they were initially investigating this. over the last two and a half years. so it is really just notable to see his name in here.
Possibly have indicted ten cases in one day, nine other ones, it is because a normal drug case or assault case, you can present that is prosecutor to a grand jury and get an indictment entertainers if the minutes. so they had a couple of hours this morning whether hearing other cases, that is how this could play out. it s important to note that if there was a racketeering charge here, the whole point of a prosecutor bringing a racketeering charges that you get to charge everybody all at once and explain to the jury, here is the whole deal. so wouldn t make much sense to split up a racketeering charge into different indictments. or waiting to see, but those are the possibilities here. michael you talk a bit about what happened earlier where a document with put online by the court? obviously it has now become part of the story, and for those who are skeptical about this process here in georgia, it adds fuel to that fire. sure. it is not uncommon for a
Campaigned fund raising was, that was not how they were going to get reelected. let s not let mitch mcconnell off the hook on this one because he let trump continue with these election lies well into december because he didn t want it to interfere with the georgia senate races that were still unfolding, the runoffs. and people in republican circles or basically like, he is just going to drop it. the georgia runoff was basically a couple of days before january 6th, there are a lot of republicans who let trump go on this journey, doing the damage that he did the country in the process for political reasons and they were upfront about that. many of them thought, oh, he would just give it up and go home and go down to mar-a-lago. that didn t happen. they are still waiting. that s in the public record, it is out there. we lived through it.
Careless or an error or something that was in an intent to deceive real consent corrupt intent. and i think from the jack smith case to this case, it s really gonna come down to that element of intent. well, i mean, one of the instances that i just told you about is john eastman who certainly is one of the last people in the ride or die vehicle with a donald trump. telling donald trump, according to this judge, judge walton, this information is not true. you cannot sign this document. and donald trump signs it anyways. and that is in so many ways emblematic of the entire series of lies that donald trump told. so many people were told that. so many republicans. so many trump supporting republicans. whether bill barr, or top officials, top republicans in michigan. top officials, republican officials in georgia. and, on and on. telling him, no, all of this is incorrect.