Coming up, a house hearing on all t auto safety and a recent recall of cars. And then a hearing on domestic terrorism. The house senate and subcommittee held a hearing on whether auto recall regulations should be overhauled. This is two and a half hours. The committee will come to order. Good morning. I want to welcome everyone to our hearing today on examining ways to improve vehicle and roadway safety. I will recognize myself for five minutes for the purpose of an Opening Statement. Certainly lives depend on the safety of cars, safety of trucks and on the roads themselves of the united states. And on the whole, the data is good around the decrease in fatalities against mines driven, b miles driven will you the hearings have underlined the severity of problems that do exist and there is no reason for going slow when it comes to safety and deception cannot and will not be tolerated. It is incumbent upon us, the national Highway Safety committee and others to be in complianc compliance.
Sympathetic to what senator rand said. In this speech, which was part of his filibuster, he also cites my book and the argument is our liberty should be presumed to be valid and government should only restrict it if they have a good reason and if they have reason, they should be able to show proof and facts, which they were unable to do with the bake shops. This is the fourth in a series of 12. What weve done if you want to learn more about these cases, if youre learning like we are and youre not a law, we have a book available for you that were selling at cost. It is written by tony morrow, 12 cases we selected for the series. If you go to cspan. Org landmark cases, you can find out how to order it and we have people ready to ship it out as soon as possible so you can follow our series. Let me say thank to you our guests for helping us understand lochner versus new york. It was a pleasure. Our landmark series cases continue next monday. Our landmark case is scheneck versus united stat