For 241892421 and lombardy street request for authorization please note that following the public testimony indicated their matter until 2013 by a vote. Good afternoon. Im with the department staff. The item before you as john avenue said was continued to address neighbor concerns that you are is project requires c u forgive the demolition. The project is here and im available for any questions that you have project sponsor please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Jonas could you please hand out the changes that have long been made to the project. Im here to present. At the last hearing the commission came back with roemgsz and questions and they asked for a list and our response to your requests. Ill go over them briefly. One of the things that was discussed is adding light wells to our western adjacent neighbor. Weve chosen to provide the windows for all the property line. Windows are not required to be responded to with sympathetic light roof but the applicant has decided to do this.
Decided to do this. So you can see there are two light wells adjacents here and just above where our neighbors windows are. The lower light well, is a operating window within our neighbor and the upper light well, is trontdz the two light wells that were responding to our neighbors property. One of the requests was to provide additional parking. The city we did require a parking variance yet the commissioners exhibited some hesitancy about this sow we have checked two garages and the intent is to rent two additional spaces so we would comply with the parking lot requirement without the variance. Widespread to note if we were to add the two Parking Spaces it would be approximately 5 hundred square feet on our property and the commercial space is 8 hundred and 82 square feet so it would did he ludicrous the commercial space it does add parking to our building. People walk blocks after they park in a neighborhood so we feel like this is a solution and to remove mechanical equipment off th
Responded to with sympathetic light roof but the applicant has decided to do this. So you can see there are two light wells adjacents here and just above where our neighbors windows are. The lower light well, is a operating window within our neighbor and the upper light well, is trontdz the two light wells that were responding to our neighbors property. One of the requests was to provide additional parking. The city we did require a parking variance yet the commissioners exhibited some hesitancy about this sow we have checked two garages and the intent is to rent two additional spaces so we would comply with the parking lot requirement without the variance. Widespread to note if we were to add the two Parking Spaces it would be approximately 5 hundred square feet on our property and the commercial space is 8 hundred and 82 square feet so it would did he ludicrous the commercial space it does add parking to our building. People walk blocks after they park in a neighborhood so we feel li
Section 181c prohibits the non conforming units to practically speaking the non units cant be altered. And section 1 city and county h prohibits the now a units in the public works dr district but they have to be consistent with the planning district. Todays ordinance would first allow noncoming from units to be expand but not beyond the envelope as it you fisted in 2013 and the supervisor will propose a further amendment that would prohibit the expansion of units where theres been a no fault e visitation in the years and finally it would allow nonconforming units to expand in a similar way in the public works dr striktd for the department remedies approval and we felt this will reduce the likelihood that those would be less affordable. We there feel theres a change that would make a naturally unit into a smaller and less affordable unit by setting a the building envelope as it was on january 1st, 2013, we first say that the non conforming units could be expanded. As proposed the units
Good afternoon. Im with the department staff. The item before you as john avenue said was continued to address neighbor concerns that you are is project requires c u forgive the demolition. The project is here and im available for any questions that you have project sponsor please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Jonas could you please hand out the changes that have long been made to the project. Im here to present. At the last hearing the commission came back with roemgsz and questions and they asked for a list and our response to your requests. Ill go over them briefly. One of the things that was discussed is adding light wells to our western adjacent neighbor. Weve chosen to provide the windows for all the property line. Windows are not required to be responded to with sympathetic light roof but the applicant has decided to do this. So you can see there are two light wells adjacents here and just above where our neighbors windows are. The lower light well, is a operating window withi