And hundreds of thousands who came spontaneously that day to protest the election and to support donald trump, but the others. What has happened to them? we re supposed to be a republic. We are supposed to be a free country. We have a constitutional system. We have due process. Take a look at the constitution. We don t have secret trials in this country. Yet, what has happened to these people? we get little spurts of information here and there from the two or three independent reporters, none of whom are associated with big media or big tech, who have bothered to look into this? what are we hearing? we are hearing that we have more fbi resources applied to this than to anything else. That people are being rounded up all over the country and being charged in some cases with misdemeanors. We have swat teams that are being used to collect people and bring them back to washington. We re hearing that they are in some of the worst jails and that some of them are being put in solitary confine
narcotic intent of the bite and campaign itself. remember that? don t worry. we are moderates. we ll make everything normal again. whatever you think of joe biden, that turned out to be one of the greatest lies ever told. in four months, this white house has changed america more quickly and more radically than ever before. they have moved so fast and with such stunning aggression, even people who are paid to keep track of it like us can barely keep up. every change they have forced has moved to the country in the very same direction, away from democracy where every voter has the same power and towards something very different, toward tyranny. most ominous of all, this is the hallmark of tierney. they have not hesitated to use the force of law to punish their political opponent. here s the latest example. at 6:00 a.m. this morning, federal agents raided the home of rudy giuliani. they seized his personal property, including his electronic devices, which include all of his digi
use. but, no, said the media. facts no longer matter not when blm s founding myth is at stake. evidence only counts in countries that have due process something they are now telling success an ugly relic of institutional racism. when unpopular people seem guilty, you just go ahead and punish them, that s the new rule. years ago we called this lynching, now we call it equity. cnn s chief legal correspondent a princeton graduate called laura coates explained this morning on twitter quote the defense begins the closing by defining reasonable doubt not with why derek chauvin is innocent, she wrote. think about that. as it happens we have thought about it. we have thought about it because that is the entire principle of our entire justice system in the united states you are not required to prove your innocence that s china. in the united states the government has to prove your guilt. and if they can t proof your guilt, they have to let you go that s the american system there is no
lockdowns as he now states which is historically impressed and in any pandemic and a terrifying practice, one day i would never vote for him. well met, where did that come from? how did faithful lifelong democrat reach that conclusion? maybe whatever preconception, naomi wolf has been paying attention and that s true for all of us regardless who we watch for. people who watch carefully my have different views than they once had appeared the reason for that is simple: reality itself is changing very fast. all over the world s the countries that seem like bulwarks of traditional rallies, property suddenly have abandoned their long-standing traditions of protecting individual and every simple police state. it is not an overstatement. the change has been sudden and it s been dramatic. the pretext has been covid. consider canada, spelling ice covered neighbor to the north. not so long a ago, candidate a strange place that its main problem was being uninterested. nothing seemed
of staff and the us special envoy to northern ireland. hello, and welcome. joe biden says he will talk to vladimir putin on friday, to try and persuade him to step back from conflict in ukraine. the united states is preparing to send 8,500 troops to eastern europe to bolster nato defences. on top of that, the administration has signalled it will retaliate by cutting energy exports to europe, should russia invade, and they will consider imposing santions on president putin himself. there will be enormous consequences if he were to go in and invade, as he could, the entire country. or a lot less than that, as well. for russia, not only in terms of economic consequences and clinical consequences, but enormous consequences, but enormous consequences worldwide if he were to move in with others forces, it would be the largest invasion since world war ii. it would change the world. move in with those forces. let me bring you up to speed with some the other development. in the u