Really affects us as a nation, because we only have 330 million people and we have to compete against china and india with over a billion people each. so we have to strengthen the fabric of our nation by educating all of our students. it s incumbent upon every segment of our population. isn t it redistribution of wealth? it s redistribution of education wealth, but it s redistribution, right? well, it s the government having a responsibility to educate everyone and looking at the best system in order to do that. but i guess i think that s very different from a situation where someone is working hard, is making, you know, a lot of money, is providing a lot of jobs and is contributing to the fabric of america and then us going along and saying, well, he s got too much. and this guy over here, he has too little so let s just take this one and give it to that one. that s much more arbitrary. well, you re talking about
Stinks. what i don t like is dishonesty. it offends me they think the american people are naive and aren t going to figure this out. they have to ban words. don t call it terrorists. don t call it redistribution. come out and say exactly what you believe and what you think the direction of this country should be. like deblauso. he s quite frank about what he thinks should happen in new york. you know, redistribution of the wealth. remember joe the plumber and president obama saying share the wealth like that s what he really believes. own it then. fair share, opportunity. i don t believe obama, like me or others, for a single payer plan. because they kept the insurance companies involved in this. when i say finite growth, what is growing is the cost of health care. that s one of the reasons people wanted health care reform. well before obama. for good reason. it was groeg. premiums were growing. at some point there s only so much of your family budget that can go towards paying p
Than you charge men. but women are getting more out of this thing. like maternity? maternity and birth control, for example. men have to pay for that. so there s a transfer from men to women. men end up paying more than women. so do the healthy. it s one big transfer scheme from this group to that group. that is redistribution. but the white house wants nothing to do that. don t call it redistribution. just call it a good thing. bad news for the white house, it s on the front page of the new york times. precisely. you cannot get away from the fact that this is redistribution. that big-picture number is very important. very roughly, very roughly 100 million americans will be paying more and will be having their money transferred to roughly 50 million americans who will pay nothing or a whole lot less through subsidies. if the president presented it the way it actually; he would not have gotten a vote. i don t think so. had he been truthful from
To pull the situation down. and i know that you agree with me. so i m not, you know don t we re, we re simpatico on this, i hate when people on other networks and other media say this falsive lens thing. both sides and blame game. there is one party that is doing this. what kind of country is this young man growing up in? what is he observing? he s observing a country where we have two americas, and one of them is whiter and let urban and less realistic and living in an alternate universe. and they are noncommunal and anti empathetic. and they are saying we don t like sharing. they call it redistribution. or socialism. we don t like sharing with the rest of you. even though we do better on that whole thing. and, you know, we are going to fight that. and if we have if we have a philosophy that is anti empathetic and anti community, then why would we not have tactics that are anti empathetic and anti community and just i mean, again, i go back to this political terrorism, what