the court s website, but adds the court s final opinion has not been released and will be issued in due course. this case is about whether women, people have the right to receive emergency care, for women specifically, emergency abortion care in a state that bans abortion. the biden administration is arguing, yes, it is federal law that a hospital must provide emergency medical treatment, no matter what. the groups who supported the biden suit offered a number of examples including an example of a woman who was 18 weeks pregnant experiencing a condition that would result in a miscarriage. but instead of treating her, idaho doctors sent her home worried they would be breaking the law by giving her an emergency abortion. her condition was so dire that traveling to another state was out of the question because the risk of miscarrying and bleeding to death was too high. so she waited. eventually, she delivered a stillborn baby and consequentially developed a serious and rapidly d
she felt threatened when serving in her post and was alarmed by the state department s failure to defend her. her appearance comes as democrats argue the president sought her removal in order to pave the way for pressure campaign in ukraine that would benefit him personally. joining me right now, congressional recorder for politico and congressional reporter for the washington post. good to see you both. how much did yovanovitch s testimony help dress in their case? i think it gave democrats the personal angle of this. she is the first human victim of what they say was trump s effort to subvert the u.s. policy ford ukraine and use it towards his own benefit and it helps make a case about how she was caught in the crossfire and unwittingly pushed out even though she was just told she was doing a great job and should have her contract extended. it juxtaposes, gives the