palling around with alex jones on january 6th. so, you know, it muddies his avenues for defense a little bit. to the second question about charging the president with a crime, i ve been saying for a while, it would have been very hard to charge the president with a crime for the conduct on january 6th. you would have run into a lot of free speech questions with the words that he said there and linking him to the actual violence. and then for seditious conspiracy, which some people have been charged and convicted of on january 6s, you d have to prove some agreement or conspiracy that is still based what s in the public record. is it conduct that is shameful, disgraceful, unpresidential, unamerican, whatever? absolutely, but i don t know if you can charge it as a crime. shermichael, to bring this into the political realm, thursday, it sounds like a lot of the candidates are going to be defending donald trump. oh, yeah. in order to do that, they re going to have to defend donald tru
being done today neighbour czechoslovakia and in the same way he is saying there are russians website at what is happening to their neighbour ukraine and he started out interestingly by saying the door is open and this is an opportunity but by the time he finished speaking he revealed they had already recruited a number of potential russian agents, people with access to information that is useful to mi6. he obviously wasn t going to specify what they did. they could be military, diplomatic, intelligence, the people who are unhappy with the invasion and the conduct of the war in ukraine. t conduct of the war in ukraine. i assume there was no particular indication in terms of who particularly he s aiming this appeal at but i suppose part of the equation is to in some way unsettle vladimir putin. t equation is to in some way unsettle vladimir putin. vladimir putin. i think you are
accountable in a way where something is actually done it. one of the features that i favor as a matter of reform section 230 reform. go really quick section 230 c 1 conduct these platforms are not liable for what s posted on their sites. c 230 c 2 taking down product. there is two parts to the act. both features should be opt. in opt in and get the benefits but that comes with consequences. c 2 take down it conduct that s it protected first amendment applies. c 1 not liable for what others post. if you really want that benefit, then you throughout also be accountable for taking certain actions to protect your users. that s the reform i suggested. no one is talking about it but i want to see conversation about it. todd: broader picture it does appear that there is bipartisan leaning here on this to get something done. what the ultimate form of that looks like is unclear. but we do know you have put
she is basically revisionist history. she has gone back to where one of our greatest presidents was assassinated. if you look at the supreme court cases it says is it consider sexual? yes, is it conduct that s obscene? it is obscene because people are oh fend. you have one people are oh fend. she said my 9-year-old is watching. i m surprised and shock that law enforcement officials any of us did that we would be arrested in a nanosecond. megyn: i looked at indecent exposure law in texas. it says a person commits an offense of indecent exposure if she exposed any part of or jenitals with the intent to