Alert. Welcome to hannity. We have three majors breaking news stories. Protests across The World Today after one former hamas leader called for an International Day of jihad. Sara carter was in times square covering a massive protest. Things are still going on in New York City. Earlier today things got tense where she was. A quick preview. Did you hear about the babies . No, they were never be headed. Thats a made up story. Thats [bleep]. Show me the [bleep] pictures now. You are lying and full of [bleep]. Sean go to x and the Prime Minister of israel account and you will see the pictures. House republicans are one step closer to finding the next speaker after nominating jim jordan. It is now time for republicans to come together. Get a new speaker with the new war breaking out in The Middle East and our ally israel involved. This is not a time for republicans to be weak. They need to be united and put aside their in fighting and move forward and reopen the peoples house. Jim jordan wo
extension, we gave it to him for nothing. when they had russian cyber attacks and shut town the colonial pipeline, we told them you can only attack certain sectors, but 6 are off limits 16 are off limits. when we left afghanistan the way we did, those are the places where the administration had a chance to establish deterrence. putin saw this, and so these tactical things today about whether our families will stay in ukraine, we ve got to do the right thing and take care of our families, but these tactical things aren t what causes vladimir putin to recalculate his cost benefit analysis. i think they don t see president biden as credible. i think they see all a this talking, these pieces of paper being exchanged as not credible. they don t protect the american people, establish deterrence and prevent, reduce the risk that a what president biden called a minor incursion, it reare minded me of when president obama called isis the jv. same kind of down canplaying of risk. it could cause
extension, we gave it to him for nothing. when they had russian cyber attacks and shut town the colonial pipeline, we told them you can only attack certain sectors, but 6 are off limits 16 are off limits. when we left afghanistan the way we did, those are the places where the administration had a chance to establish deterrence. putin saw this, and so these tactical things today about whether our families will stay in ukraine, we ve got to do the right thing and take care of our families, but these tactical things aren t what causes vladimir putin to recalculate his cost benefit analysis. i think they don t see president biden as credible. i think they see all a this talking, these pieces of paper being exchanged as not credible. they don t protect the american people, establish deterrence and prevent, reduce the risk that a what president biden called a minor incursion, it reare minded me of when president obama called isis the jv. same kind of down canplaying of risk. it could cause
there s a moral equivalence between white supremacists, neognaneo-nazis? no. are we a nation that rips children in their parents at the border. no. but trump does. >.do we embrace putin and kim jong-un? we don t but trump does. whether the deportations that happ in the obama days will be brought up by other democrats in the ca debates coming in june. that sounded very divider ish. who is the real decider. divider. you re talking about trump and all of the people who voted for him, who want america to be good and strong and free, want to stand for the anthem, love their military and love having great jobs and pay. remember when obama called isis
president s policy and they are right we shouldn t have called isis the jv and maybe they should use the term radical islamic extremists. they might be right about that, but they are wrong the policy has failed when they won t offer an alternative policy, which is what the president was pointing out today. in other words, until they say, yes, we re for boots on the ground, they have an identical policy to that being pursued by president obama. they don t have much substantive ground on which to criticize him. we see the republican field is so much larger, obviously. there are these nontraditionals, nonpolitical or not politician candidates who gained so much ground but when it comes to the foreign policy experience, clearly different than other folks in their field. how does that come into play? you have the candidates who claim they have foreign policy