carolina family found guilty onl on all counts in the murder trial of his wife and son. a panel of 12 jurors returned a guilty verdict after fewer than three hours ofit w deliberationass. and it was so quick to quick. in fact, the judge didn t even offer him dinner. e now, according to reporters insy the room, his only living son , buster, sat in the gallery shaking his head in disbelief. but he did not appear to shed a tear. now, the trial really took thats turn after the jury saw a keyaw piece of evidence. it was a snapchat video taken by paul murdaugh at a dog minut kennels just minutes before hees and maggie were killed. lled listen.listen. you re going to hear three separate voices now for[is tibarbara. this is a chick now alex murdaugh maintained for years that he was not there. but when witnesses said he was third voice, murdaugh finally atted to , here s why. as my addiction evolved over time, i would get anyor cir situations or circumstances whercue i would get
executing a search warrant at president biden s residence as a deciding factor for not allowing it, even though she agreed probable cause existed. prosecutors said not to ask about the big guy or dad when conducting interviews. steps by doj i ve never seen in my 14 years and makes no sense. wolf tips off the biden counsel about your plan to search the storage unit. is that right. absolutely. john: former doj prosecutor lesley wolf, on the hot seat as part of the hunter biden investigation. sandra: testifying behind closed doors after whistleblowers said she obstructed the fbi investigating president biden during the five-year-long probe. the panel sounds off in moments. first, a fox news alert from the white house. john: awaiting the first white house briefing since house lawmakers voted to launch a formal impeachment inquiry into president biden. republicans turn up the heat in their investigations of the first family. hello, john roberts in washington. good thur
Years that he was not there. but when witnesses said he was third voice, murdaugh finally atted to , here s why. as my addiction evolved over time, i would get anyor cir situations or circumstances whercue i would get paranoid thinking and it couldold of be anything that that triggeredt it. once i told a lie, then i told my family at had to keep.i ha now the defenseve to keep isg that a lack of physical evidence would help them in their case. founto theto this day, investige not found the family ownedd rifle that they say he used norh to kill his wife, nor haveavn ud i found the shotgun used to kill his son t, paul . but the prosecution bankedatte on none of that mattering like the lie of him being at the kennels. they sold the jury on alecades o
That there really is an impeachable offense that has been committed. on the other hand, they are definitely doing this in a sort of underhand way. you ve got adam schiff running this secret inquiry come pretty much. he is on record having said he was aware of proof that trump colluded with russia. he said that. and yet we all know now that it isn t true. there is every reason to be suspicious that the democrats want to do what they want dome i wanted all along, to make president trump on re-electable. they don t really mind whether he s ousted by impeachment or whether he is ousted by the election. harris: i will end with this, three g.o.p. senators now susan collins, mitt romney, and ben sasse all condemning the call for china to investige joe biden. he started with a republican saying it s a joke. there are some i don t agree with that. hugo gurdon,
On his hine and endorsing an investigation for a guy who wouldn t even be there under your scenario. we want to have the investigation and make sure that all voices are heard. neil: no you don t. you just said you want to hear from everyone who has anything to say on this charge decades old but by the way republicans you had should really heed the guy yoheave the guyyou are investige don t like him. not about liking him. why do this kabuki theater. let s understanding just from kavanaugh s testimony yesterday he can never rule on anything involving the clintons, the clinton foundation, anything involving campaign finance. neil: why are we wasting our time that s a ridiculous argument. that s not silly because he has already shown he has a bias against these individuals so, yes, let s have the investigation but let s find a better justice to put up there. you have a bias against him. neil: i don t think i have heard anything more silly. you want an investigation. have