this is the ingraham angle s th from washington tonight, elon musk and mark zuckerberge lo. rd now, they have tentatively agreed to fight each other in the vegas octagon, to quote joe biden joke. so who better to handicap this n fight than? mma legends colby covington and michael chandler. they re going to join us in a bit later in the hour to weigh is n on the battlego royale. and i want to get you involved, too. so go to my twitte t twittr atam ingram angel or instagram atm ingram radio and answe r thisn poll question. who would win a cage matcha ? kr elon musk or mark zuckerberg? your results later in the hour. but first,, lies. s and whistleblower is that s the focus of tonight s angle. now, just when you thought the bidens couldn t get any sleep here, they surprise you, whether it s sniffing girls ghairirl or copping a feel fra longoria at the white house. the presidentwhite ho has noe or no sense or maybe neither. the same arrogance is seen inou his son. and now w
Return for the 2016 dnc server and burisma investigation. When you heard burisma, you didnt see it as code for biden, the bidens . I did not. When did you know that. Your testimony saying that burisma included the bidens when the readout came out. My testimony wasnt specific with regards to the date. September . I dont recall the date. If i told you that the Legal Definition of bribery was an event of offering, giving, soliciting or receiving of any item of value and the means of influencing an action of an individual holding a public or legal duty. Do you believe that not only was it quid pro quo but it was bribery. Not a lawyer and im not going to characterize what
something was or wasnt legally. You also said in your Opening Statement that Secretary Perry and yourself, as well as Ambassador Volker worked with giuliani on the ukraine matter, and express direction of the president. Is that right . You also go on to say that we did not want to work with giuliani, simply put we played t
i would tell your viewers, go online tonight. they re online. onlthese are top irs investigas that have been on this case foro five plus years. they have been at every level told to stand down by the department of justice. and if you read there the level of criminality is allegedlleged by these whistleblowers is mind blowing. anind by the way, these aren twl republicans saying this. these are whistleblowers at the highest level involvede blod this. and let s remember what happened here. 8 mi$8 million hunter biden got from ukraine, china and romania didn t pay taxes on it. and then the sudden there s whe this rush to do a plea agreement when we re going to have the transcripts revealed today. they wanted that plea agreement out. they wanted that out before these transcripts were out, correct? absolutelyorrect olutely. . they ve been working on this for five and a half years and locking in suddenlon mondaye on monday morning when it gets t announced that we re going to release those t
you pass out and you don t know what s going on when you get home. i would not buy side at all, but especially until they catch you did this. carley: absolutely. one of the things we are learning about this area great advice, by the way there it is not new york city. where you have crimes, cameras on every corner. it is a rule college town and this area is one where they have a lot of college homes so they don t make there may not have been cameras in the area, de, andthere are some investigas saying even if you have something that may not seem like a big deal, handed them because what might not be in the footage just as important as what could be in the footage. so great advice, great analysis, jonathan and thank you for joining us here you got it. i want to say one at the thing, i was a part of the times square investigation where a bomber drove up on a bicycle and put a
president trump in his efforts to obtain those investigation, did you realize those investigas could impact the 2020 election? no. do you believe it s appropriate ever appropriate to invite, press, bribe, or coerce foreign interference in our elections? no. thank you. i want to refer to something you cite in your opening statement. as i previously testified, had i known of all of mr. giuliani s dealings or of his associations with individuals now under criminal indictment, i would not have acquiesced to his participation. it s hard to read that without believing that you thought that what he was doing was either wrong or that he was not reputable. fair? well. with 20/20 hindsight.