so much to get to in the next 90 minutes, along with my colleagues here with us this week, katy tur, stephanie ruhle. the challenge today for the house managers is going to be to get into the aftermath of what happened on january 6th but we ve already learned a number of new things, just from the last 24 hours. because house managers showed a trove of never before seen security video, body cam footage, radio transmissions piecing together the day. we re going to show it to you in the order it happened on january 6th. starting with a new detail from before that day and of course a warning, you ve heard it before but some of this video and audio is disturbing. house managers say when then president trump tweeted what they described as a kind of save the date for the rally back in december permits had not even been requested yet for the 6th and organizers ended up amending their original request. fast forward to the 6th. listen to the police scatter audio from just after the pre
mistreatment of haitian migrants, the democratic gridlock and the stalled progress against covid. polls bounce up and down, what s striking is how the president of the united states is such a minimal media presence. he s done 10 one on one interviews, takes questions infrequently, is intentionally bland on social media. that sometimes makes him look like a bystander. even biden s boosters in the media are starting to suggest he may not win re-election. a washington post columnist calls a trump victory in 2024 may be the outcome. the media don t like him. the new consensus for now is that joe biden is in trouble. i m howard kurtz and this is media buzz. howie: i ll have in depth interviews with bret baier and mollie hemingway. from the left to the right with few exceptions, the pundits are no longer denying the president s weakened political standing. the democratic party is looking over the edge of the cliff. you re not seeing that strong joe biden leadership that people
over safety concerns. ministers want to move hundreds more onto the bibby stockholm, some, though, have refused, launching legal challenges. this comes as the home office announced a task force to crack down on rogue lawyers who may be helping migrants to remain in the uk, under false claims. ellie price reports. the first asylum seekers move into their new temporary home off the coast of dorset. 15 arrived yesterday on day one, but not everyone who was supposed to come here did. we ve had a small group of about 20, i believe, who ve refused to come on board. accommodation is offered on a no choice basis and i can t go into the details of the specific legal proceedings for each individual, but we are continuing to bring people on board later this week and then over the coming weeks as well. today will be the first full day the new residents of the barge have to get used to their new surroundings. we re told there ll be hourly buses to take them to nearby areas. but how local
election that they re trying to put a difference between their reaching net zero in a way which doesn t hurt people and blaming the opposition for wanting to reach net zero in a way which does hurt people. i think it s a pretty barmy way of dealing with it. but in the end, of course, it s also damaging, notjust to the earth, but the fact is, it s very bad for the cost of living because the sort of things that mr sunak wants to do will hold up reducing energy prices, getting things to people in a cheaper way. but rishi sunak s entire logic is that what he is doing by adapting the way in which the uk is committing itself to the net zero target of 2050, what he s doing is protecting the interests of, as he puts it, working families. it is not right, says the pm, that working families should face significant costs as part of this transition to net zero. do you agree with that proposition or not? of course it s right, but what he s doing is the opposite. the fact is that this is t
conservative. you re also pretty much a lifelong campaigner for the environment. right now, does it feel like those two commitments are incompatible? oh, no. they re just temporarily in abeyance because the government is so fixated on trying to do something to rescue the next election, that they re trying to put a difference between their reaching net zero in a way which doesn t hurt people, and blaming the opposition for wanting to reach net zero in a way which does hurt people. i think it s a pretty barmy way of dealing with it. but in the end, of course, it s also damaging, notjust to the earth, but the fact is, it s very bad for the cost of living, because the sort of things that mr sunak wants to do will hold up reducing energy prices, getting things to people in a cheaper way. but rishi sunak s entire logic is that what he is doing by adapting the way in which the uk is committing itself to the net zero target of 2050, what he s doing is protecting the interests of, as