With our student cam contest, giving students the opportunity to discuss what important issues they want to hear the most. Contesthe student cam and road to the white house coverage on tv, on the radio, and online at cspan. Org. 70 years ago, an International Military tribunal began trials of 22 leading nazi officials in germany. Your charge with dilating trees, waging aggressive war and crimes against manatee. Andfilm nazi concentration prison cramps and prison camps was shown in the courtroom. In a moment, we will show that hourlong film. But first, a film historian with the u. S. Holocaust Memorial Museum describes the documentary. We will see the original introduction of the film in the nuremberg courtroom. The film nazi concentration , what was that . It was used as proof against the high command tried at the nuremberg military tribunal in 1945 and 1946. It was a film shot by the allies, the soviets also, as they entered several of the larger concentration camps. Corpses,corp. Thi
What the allies were trying to communicate both in the courtroom and to people back home who were just then learning about these horrible crimes. Prosecution for the United States will at this time present for the permission a documentary film con concentration camps. This is by no means entire proof which the prosecution will offer with respect to the subject of concentration camps. But this film we offer represents in a brief and unforgettable form an explanation of what the words concentration camp embody. I, george d. Stevens, colonel, army of the United States, hereby certify that from the 1st of march 1945 to the 8d of mai, 1945, i was on active duty, supreme headquarters al allied Expeditionary Forces and among my official duties was the direction of photographing of nazi concentration camps and prison camps as liberated by allied forces. The Motion Pictures which will be shown following this affidavit were taken by official United States Army Signal Corps photographic teams in
Delivered hot meals to the little park outside of the Gates Foundation and the dc offices and i would see that then. Every night. And i would see the lines of people there every night. And i knew that it was 10,000 volunteers, 80 hardworking staff. And that they had enormous influence in the community that they were serving that was a great brand, and i thought, why would i not join that organization and see if i can put my skills to work and also see if i can understand better. And why do we have this issue that is persistent with child poverty. And so many children that are graduating high school and going on to college and being able to attach to careers the way that i was able to . This is part of cspan2 and q a. President obamas top economic adviser says on eximmigration should be the next economic priorities for congress, the third way think tank hosted this with Bill Schneider moderating. Welcome. We are happy to have jason with us so lets start with it and then we will turn it
If its not okay. The consumers say no it doesnt happen. Icons, pictures, you know, its a very important issue. Transparency is a third issue. I futured on that. I think theres more we can do to inform consumers about what is happening with the data and what control they might have over it. The foirt is an important one. Its the issue of identification. And as much as possible question really focus on using information in a form that is identified as robustly as possible. First of all, identify to the extent reasonably possible. From a technological perspective. And the company engaged in using the deidentified information promises not to not reidentify the information. Now there have been showing how easy it to take it. And retype with individuals. And particular individuals. Terrorist a promise to not reidentify. If it is transferred to anyone escaladed. The Company Holding the data to moms to also not change we see in technology and focus how we can implement these important principl
Pickering that this is a breakthrough moment . I wonder if you could comment on the domestic pressures facing the foreign minister and president rouhani. I was struck by the contradictory reactions. Iranians wentthe back home and were greeted by protests. For the first time, we have had direct talks between two Foreign Ministers. For the first time, we had a phone conversation between two president s. Two president s have nominated the Foreign Ministers. Five, 6, 7 rounds of direct negotiations before the deal and the talks are continuing. This iser had clear. , we havetic situation the same domestic situation that you have in the u. S. Deal. Are supporting the some politicians are opposing the deal. Some politicians are silent. Almost everything is the same at the same level. There is a big difference. Inre is foreign intervention the u. S. Decision. The israelis are interfering and in thedecision u. S. Decision. This is the big difference between our domestic situations. That this is