and i m alex marquardt in washington. next up we have the whole story with arnd cooper investigating the whole history of the running of the bulls. good night. every summer, cities across spain participate in a centuries old tradition called the running of the bulls. it began as a way to transfer bulls from the country to inside city walls, where they were either sold or used for bullfighting. the most famous bull run is in pamplona. it s part of the san fermin festival. and it has attracted tourists from all over the world since ernest hemingway popularized it in his 1926 novel, the sun also rises. but the event is not without controversy. many of the bulls who run are later killed in the bullfighting ring. animal rights groups have been calling for an end to this in spain. and it s also dangerous for the people who choose to run. cnn s david culver, went to the san fermin festival to take a a closer look k at y ththis traditionon still hols after so many centuries, and
it s s brave. itit s ferocioious. it d doesn t bacack downwn from anytything. run.n. [mususic playingng] my firstst piece of f advice toto anyone isis don t runu. bill hillmann: when he hit me, i just shot straight up in the air, twisted in the air. tasio blazquez mutsaerts: when i fell, i just i was thinking, oh my, oh my. dadavid culverer: can t bebele i i m doing ththis tomorror. denis clancey: that bull can turn on a dime and come after you. bill hillmann: he smashed into daniel jimeno romero full speed, and gored him in the aorta, severered his aoror. denis clancecey: last amererin to d die in sanfermines, died right here. [chatttter] every y day, someoeone s lifes a lilittle alterered or compmpy altered because of this run. [screaming] [bells chiming] peoplele prepare all year for this. ththey train f for this. it s a sererious thingng. there e are bull r runs all l over spainin. but a lot t of runnersrs end upe in p pamplona bebecause theyeyg the biggest, the most fea
ininterpreter frame for interpreting the constitution is now clearly looking back through history. so we see that even in the heller case where the justices, even the justices in dissent, were all analyzing the issues in the second amendment through a historical lens. what was meant at the time of the founding. so that is now the way in which constitutional interpretation is done. do you identify with that position? i identify with the position in so far as that s how the text is interpreted of the constitution. that i am a strong believer, as i said, in precedent, starre decisis and the way the law interprets the constitution is through this historical frame. i m grateful for your last couple of minutes because i think that it s in the american
0 first of two long and intense days of questioning from members of the senate judiciary committee began this morning with democrats using their questions to allow jackson to issue a rebuttal to republican accusations that she has been soft on crime and republicans pressing her on her record as a judge and public defender and bringing up a whole host of conservative hobby horses. things like critical race theory. jackson has tried to stay above the fray in her responses. early on in the hearing, she told democratic senator, dick durbin, quote, i tried to stay in my lane. along with me are claire mccaskill and msnbc political analyst with danielle holly walker, dean and professor at howard school of law and joyce vance, law professor at university of alabama as well as an msnbc legal analyst. we have a few minutes before we go back to the hearing. claire, i want to start with you. just some of the fireworks that happened earlier today. just in the last hour or so. senator ted cruz arriv
he had a one-on-one meeting with putin at a g-20 dinner where the only other person president was putin s interpreter then the helsinki summit. he looked like he was scared of putin and had that one-on-one meeting and according to the washington post reporter you just cited, b trump s aides still don t know what happened there. they never got a full readout of trump s meet wg putin. that s as fishy as you can get. i just had a member of the house member foreign relations who said he hopes this ininterpreter will be subpoenaed. i think the administration will exert executive privilege and there s a reasonable case. in general, you want presidents to feel free to speak around interpreters, but this is an extraordinary case. not a normal presidency. not a norm alleal case.