just. if you rob a bank and you re convicted for robbing a bank, that s a fair and just outcome. but there s a second way we measure our justice system. you rob a bank, you re convicted of robbing the bank but it prosecutor is talking about his disdain for tall, white women with dark hair and he s been doing flat 20 years. people doubt that the process has the inhad teg rety that it ought to have. so you need the perception of the cyst fweem fair and the system to actually be fair and here s the problem with the text messages. it answers one of those questions or pretends. it suggests the process is not fair. what i was hoping would happen is the inspector general would put out a report telling us about everything. there was a bad perception, perhaps they shouldn t have written what they wrote. i m not convinced the first amendment argument gets us out of this thing meaning they can write whatever they want to