. mark: hello america i marked levin and this is life, liberty & levin sunday. i m thrilled you are here to great guest peter schwarzer and charles payne before we get them the constitution of the united states it s an amazing thing, isn t it? it s an amazing thing to listen to some of these lawyers on these reprobate networks, msnbc, cnn, or read the new york times of the washington post which i really do. i do get clips. or the rest of it you can tell they target certain judges like alito, thomas, now judge cannon in florida how they build up and praise others. this is an effort of obvious intimidation of constitutionalist brain washing of their small audiences at the same time promoting activism on the courts because they do not believe in the constitution. we have heard for years crt we have heard for years the 16th 19 project. we have heard for years the constitution was written by white slaveholders. this is a white dominant society but we are told today that peo
. mark: hello america i marked levin and this is life, liberty & levin sunday. i m thrilled you are here to great guest peter schwarzer and charles payne before we get to them the constitution of the united states it s an amazing thing, isn t it? it s an amazing thing to listen to some of these lawyers on these reprobate networks, msnbc, cnn, or read the new york times of the washington post which i really do. i do get clips. or the rest of it you can tell they target certain judges like alito, thomas, now judge cannon in florida how they build up and praise others. this is an effort of obvious intimidation of constitutionalist brain washing of their small audiences at the same time promoting activism on the courts because they do not believe in the constitution. we have heard for years crt we have heard for years the 16th 19 project. we have heard for years the constitution was written by white slaveholders. this is a white dominant society but we are told today that
. mark: hello america i marked levin and this is life, liberty & levin sunday. i m thrilled you are here to great guest peter schwarzer and charles payne before we get to them the constitution of the united states it s an amazing thing, isn t it? it s an amazing thing to listen to some of these lawyers on these reprobate networks, msnbc, cnn, or read the new york times of the washington post which i really do. i do get clips. or the rest of it you can tell they target certain judges like alito, thomas, now judge cannon in florida how they build up and praise others. this is an effort of obvious intimidation of constitutionalist brain washing of their small audiences at the same time promoting activism on the courts because they do not believe in the constitution. we have heard for years crt we have heard for years the 16th 19 project. we have heard for years the constitution was written by white slaveholders. this is a white dominant society but we are told today that
Constitution says on the appointment? there are actually two issues. one is a statutory issue. it is not even a statute on the book that allows for the appointment of someone come a private person like robert mueller to be on there. even if there were has to be appointed on the appointments clause which has two classes of officers. principal offices which require approval by the senate. u.s. attorneys have to go through senate confirmation. robert mueller is just as powerful if not more so than the average u.s. attorney pete he is like a super u.s. attorney. a u.s. attorney at large. he can be in virginia and he could be in dc, new york. therefore, we say he is a principal officer and has to be appointed by the president and approved by the senate. the government says he is really an inferior officer. and we said fine, under the constitution or inferior offices have to be appointed by the head of the department. the head of the department is
And is that a reminder it would be a mistake for this president to submit himself to questioning by bob mueller or his team that these things can go out of control? i d advise the president not to submit to questioning. i think it probably would be a perjury trap, i think the president could handle himself well. for me, it s constitutional. a president may be able to be subpoenaed in had certain cases, you have bob mueller, an inferior office, and he wants to subpoena the president to conduct oversight over article two of the constitution? i don t think that will fly on separation of powers grounds. i think it would be a bad precedent to let inferior offices in your government second guess presidential decision making unless there s somehow some obvious evidence this is some part of criminal enterprise, but they ve not been