. mark: hello america i marked levin and this is life, liberty & levin sunday. i m thrilled you are here to great guest peter schwarzer and charles payne before we get them the constitution of the united states it s an amazing thing, isn t it? it s an amazing thing to listen to some of these lawyers on these reprobate networks, msnbc, cnn, or read the new york times of the washington post which i really do. i do get clips. or the rest of it you can tell they target certain judges like alito, thomas, now judge cannon in florida how they build up and praise others. this is an effort of obvious intimidation of constitutionalist brain washing of their small audiences at the same time promoting activism on the courts because they do not believe in the constitution. we have heard for years crt we have heard for years the 16th 19 project. we have heard for years the constitution was written by white slaveholders. this is a white dominant society but we are told today that peo
. mark: hello america i marked levin and this is life, liberty & levin sunday. i m thrilled you are here to great guest peter schwarzer and charles payne before we get to them the constitution of the united states it s an amazing thing, isn t it? it s an amazing thing to listen to some of these lawyers on these reprobate networks, msnbc, cnn, or read the new york times of the washington post which i really do. i do get clips. or the rest of it you can tell they target certain judges like alito, thomas, now judge cannon in florida how they build up and praise others. this is an effort of obvious intimidation of constitutionalist brain washing of their small audiences at the same time promoting activism on the courts because they do not believe in the constitution. we have heard for years crt we have heard for years the 16th 19 project. we have heard for years the constitution was written by white slaveholders. this is a white dominant society but we are told today that
. mark: hello america i marked levin and this is life, liberty & levin sunday. i m thrilled you are here to great guest peter schwarzer and charles payne before we get to them the constitution of the united states it s an amazing thing, isn t it? it s an amazing thing to listen to some of these lawyers on these reprobate networks, msnbc, cnn, or read the new york times of the washington post which i really do. i do get clips. or the rest of it you can tell they target certain judges like alito, thomas, now judge cannon in florida how they build up and praise others. this is an effort of obvious intimidation of constitutionalist brain washing of their small audiences at the same time promoting activism on the courts because they do not believe in the constitution. we have heard for years crt we have heard for years the 16th 19 project. we have heard for years the constitution was written by white slaveholders. this is a white dominant society but we are told today that
thomas. in a 32-page opinion objecting to what he considers a lack of due process. still not delivered by the high court, with only a week or so left in this year s long-awaited decision on whether former president trump is immune from prosecution. and whether emergency medical care can disapprove abortions if necessary. also, the judge in the mar-a-lago classiied documents case raising more questions as she permits outside interest groups to argue long-decided issues. has still not set a trial date a full year after she first got the case. a stunning new york times report that fellow judges had advised her to recuse herself because of her inexperience. have her questionable procedures accomplished making sure this doesn t get before a jury before the election? good day, everyone. i m andrea mitchell in washington. the supreme court has just ruled 8-1 to uphold a federal ban on gun ownership by people under restraining orders for domestic abuse. the case was brought by
The oval office where the president says to them, now a lot of pressure is off me now that i got rid of comey with this whole russia deal. well, look, if it wasn t on his mind, if it wasn t a motivation for him legal or illegal, right or wrong, it was clearly in his mind about why he wanted to get rid of comey. again, you re acting as if that s not a constitutional right if that was, in fact, what was in his mind. again, that s speculation. but i think that that s what we have to be clear here. i have to look at what the law is as the evidence exists and what the law is. and when you get to the article 2 issue, it s a very serious moment. right. constitutionally for our country if a president s decision making on what s called inferior office that s not in a pejorative way. it s what the constitution and rules and regulations actually say. it does. to say you can then cross-examine, so to speak, the president any president on that decision, very dangerous and exactly