Nominal Index [Citation 301 – 619]Bina Saxena w/o Late Ravendra Kumar Saxena v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 301Hemant Dhirajlal Banker v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 302CIT v. M/s.
Nominal Index [Citation 314 – 350]XXX vs State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 314State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. Sudhir Bhagwat Kalekar 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 315Bharat Parihar v. State of Maharashtra.
Supreme Court Special Effects & 3D Conversion Services Are Not ‘Video-Tape Production’ Services Under S. 65(120) Of Finance Act, 1994: Supreme Court Case Title: Commissioner of Service.
The Bombay High Court held that capital gains cannot be added as unexplained cash credit for the sale of penny stock.The bench of Justice K.R. Shriram and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwalla has observed.