arraignment wraps inside that manhattan courtroom. as i said, that image you see on the right-hand side of your screens with the president and his attorneys as he sits at the defendant s table in the courtroom just moments ago. so obviously as we have said quite a bit today, but it s worth repeating, this is a historic moment. we have never seen this before in the united states of america. a former president under indictment, under arrest and now being charged with 34 counts of felonies. former attorney general bill barr is standing by with us, brit hume is also here to weigh-in momentarily. first we go to bryan llenas who is live at the courthouse where we expect shortly the president will be exiting soon. hi, bryan. hi, martha. that s exactly right. two big questions right now ahead of us. when will the former president come out. should be any moment. will he say anything to the cameras. what will he say now that he knows the charges. the second question is, knowing more
federal regulators of campaign finance can t agree on what is an in kind contribution. in the edwards case, the election commission and the department of justice disagreed. they re the experts here. i don t think he gets in the door legally. if he could get in the door, i don t think he can make the case evidence-wise. martha: if that s the case and i m going to ask bill barr to weigh-in too, andy, if that s the case and you re the judge, how do you allow that to go forward in the secondary crime which has to be in place in order to prove that there was manipulation going on here that you were trying to obfuscate these business records with the indebt to do something harmful, how can he allow it to go forward? i was in the middle of saying why this lawyer would take the case. the one reason he would take it because at the end of the day it s a winner. at some point someone will
the president of the united states and members of his administration continue to deny the russian government interfered in our elections. just as recently as june 28, russia continues to say they had nothing to do with meddling. yes, sir. even secretary nielsen said i don t believe s seen that conclusion that the specific indebt was to help president trump win. i don t recall carying that. in addition to that, you know about a trump tower meeting where there was a discussion between members of the trump campaign and russian operatives, correct? i m aware of that. the president sir, i would not characterize it one way or the other with operatives. okay. in that meeting, there was a discussion about dirt that the russians had on hillary clinton. media reporting indicated that. the president issued a statement that he lie about that meeting and said it was an adoption discussion. those statements have been made. i m relying what is in the media and not fbi. so
a railway in return as usual he demanded land for banana plantations have the right swap rate the railway for his own needs he also acquired control over the country s main ports and the telegraph network. in other words guatemala gave away to the united fruit company its infrastructure its economy and its future in exchange for a railway. the company s empire grew to the detriment of the young nations in search of progress but with no resources and indebt. thanks for the money lead it s people the dirt of the poor helps line the pockets of the rich that privatising the entire public sector through debt mechanism is the act of expropriation of common