oral arguments made clear this court will overturn roe and they ll insist on their own reasonableness the whole time. dahlia explained to us what she heard that day that gave her the basis for that sort of clarion take. listen. i think going into argument today, there was a narrative that went, this isn t really a 6-3 court. it s a 3-3-3 court that amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh and the chief justice are incrementalists, they care what people think. there was no reason to believe, other than the chief justice, who was trying to figure out a middle way not to overturn roe, maybe we could move the viability line and be okay with a 15-week instead of 24-week ban. there was no reason to believe, rachel, that he had a single other person on the court with him in that project. i think anyone who could count counted all of the conservative justices, except for roberts, gunning for roe.
today, there was a narrative that went, this isn t really a 6-3 court, it s a 3-3 court that amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh and the chief justice are incrementalists, they care about what people think, they worry about those legitimate questions you and nancy were just talking about, but they re going to tap the breaks, not do anything crazy. there was no reason to believe other than the chief justice, who was trying to figure out a middle way not to overturn roe, maybe we could move the viability line and be okay with a 15-week instead of 24-week ban. there was no reason to believe, rachel, that he had a single other person on the court with him in that project. i think anyone who could count, counted all of the conservative justices except for roberts gunning for roe. you said today in your piece
here, i know this has been an intense day. hi, rachel. so tell me about that clarity. oral arguments today made clear this court will overturn roe. you are not in the minority in asserting that, but what is the basis for that clarity that you feel about this? i think going into argument today, there was a narrative that went, this isn t really a 6-3 court, it s a 3-3 court that amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh and the chief justice are incrementalists, they care about what people think, they worry about those legitimate questions you and nancy were just talking about, but they re going to tap the brakes, not do anything crazy. there was no reason to believe other than the chief justice, who was trying to figure out a middle way out not to overturn roe maybe we could move the viability line and be okay with a 15-week instead of 24-week ban. there was no reason to believe,
clearly. i like the team. let me rephrase that. i love the team. and so i m an incrementalist. most entrepreneurs you will find are incrementalists, to say something overly bold or overly dramatic is unfair. what good entrepreneurs do is they start the day and they go through the process. the navy s.e.a.l.s will tell you that if you want to eat an eegant, you got to do it one bite at a time and sarah and i will do that together. anthony, did you have any hesitation taking this job knowing it might cause some friction and that it might lead to sean leaving, which is what s going to happen and the two are at least somewhat coincidental. and did you have any hesitation about how you would relate to the rest of the white house staff if you came in under those circumstances. okay, well, listen, you know, remember, i m a business person, and so what happens in business a lot of the times is you have some rotation in personnel as you re making changes and you have lifestyle choices that p