Person to be charged in connection with the insurrection according to one count is a former president and a current front runner for the nomination of a Major Political party who is already facing 74 criminal counts. Who stands accused of trying to defraud the government that he led at that time. Trying to obstruct the proceedings of a branch of government and trying to overturn the will of millions of voters in the swing states that determined the outcome of the Electoral College. The big question now that trump has been booked and fingerprinted, whats next in this case . Which is really unlike any other in American History. Here is what team trump has planned according to the New York Times. His lawyers used the arraignment to hint at one of his central defense strategies, a request to delay a second pending federal trial for months if not years. Delaying the proceedings as much as possible is widely expected to be part of mr. Trumps legal strategy given that he could effectively cal
Common sense teach us that you don t get a free pass to commit crime just because you chose to commit some of those crimes using some words. to this point about how first amendment protections would play a bigger role in jack smith had charged incitement, can you expand on that, and i wonder if you expect a super ceding indictment that would charge him with insurrection? an incitement chart would be a much more thorny first amendment matters. incitement is one of a very tiny number of categories of speech that have been carved out of the protection of the first amendment by the supreme court, and it s very, very narrowly defined. we use the term to the