With the findings in the horowitz report. Horrow its seems to be giving the fbi that part of the investigation saying its a clean bill. They had enough reason to do this investigation. Everybody who was interviewed cements to indicate they did not open an investigation. Evan perez, thank you so much. Joining our panel now, we have with us jim bakker. You are not singled out the report makes clear the fbi failed when it came to the administering the fisa warrants, too much was left out or not presented to the court. Do you accept what the Inspector General is saying . I am there are two big groups of conclusions, one is, it was not a politically motivated
investigation and it was properly predicated with us goingforward with that investigation. It was malpractice for us not to open this investigation. All of the statements that it was a hoax are wrong. The investigation was not a coup or a coup attempt. Having said that, he does point out many mistakes that were made with respect to err
and mr. castor, have you seen this article from politico dated january 11th, 2017. yes, i have. sand ukrainian efforts to sabotage trump backfired. is that correct. yes. i want to read you the second paragraph. officials tried to help hillary clinton sand undermine trump by questioning his office and implick sating a top trump aide in corruption ant suggesting they were investigating the matter only to back away after the election and they helped clinton s allies research damaging information on trump and his advisers, a politico investigation found. isn t it true that president trump had a legitimate reason to request help from the ukraine about the 2016 election. and i m not suggesting russia didn t interfere. of course they interfered. but the ukraine officials tried to influence the election?