Live Breaking News & Updates on Imperative Public Importance|Page 2
Stay updated with breaking news from Imperative public importance. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
it for me tonight. thank you very much for being here. now it is time for the last word with lawrence o donnell. good evening, rachel. we re gonna have two miracle workers joining us tonight, senators jon tester and sherrod brown, who somehow managed to get reelected to the senate in states where no other democrat can win. but we begin tonight with our history lessons from professor laurence tribe, also andrew weissmann is with us on this really historic night in the case of united states of america versus donald j trump. i m looking forward to hear that. the supreme court getting involved at this stage, even just to say that jack smith, we would consider what you are asking us to do. that alone is such a big deal. we will consider it, and we are ready to start hearing. we want your response by next week. i mean, it s happening. it s on. here we go. and, rachel, guess who was proven wrong today? that would be me. as of last, i think, it was thursday night, i h ....
(vo) in three seconds, janice will win a speedboat. (woman) bingo! i m moving to the lake. gotta sell the house. (vo) ooh! that s a lot of work. (woman) ooh! (vo) don t worry. skip the hassels and sell directly to opendoor. (woman) bingo. (vo) get your competitive offer at opendoor dot com. good morning, lawrence. we ll have two miracle workers join us tonight. senators jon tester and sherrod brown, who somehow managed to get re-elected to the senate in states where no other democrat can win. but we begin tonight with our history lessons from professor laurence tribe, also andrew weissmann with us on this really historic night in the case of united states of america versus donald j. trump. looking forward to hearing that. the supreme court getting involved at this stage. even just to say to jack smith, we will consider what you re asking us to do. that alone is such a big deal. we will consider it, and we re ready to start hearing. we want your respons ....
is running in to a buzz saw. this moment forcing the first of what could be more presidents resignations to come. remember this. at penn, does calling for the genocide of jews violate penn s rules or code of conduct? yes or no. if the speech turns in to conduct, it can be harassment, yes. i m asking calling for the genocide of jews, does that constitute bullying or harassment? if it is directed, it s harassment. so the answer is yes? it s a context dependent decision. that s your answer? calling for the genocide of jews is context? it s not bullying or harassment? this is the easy answer. that was the university of penn s president and harvard and mit and perhaps others next? when cnn lays in to this story with this monologue yesterday, we may finally be seeing a tipping point in america. listen closely to his words. american universities have been neglecting a core focus on excellence in order to pursue a variety of agendas. many of them clustered aro ....
have multiple judges in other words, but it off. and it is critical putting it off. but it will be going to the october term. gregg: it is such an important issue, i read the judge in michigan s decision, judge vinson s, i read, judge hudson s i read and they are all really, really well researched and the supreme court is rich with material, based on the federal wait. i think the there are 28 lawsuits right now. mercedes, we have to agree on something, the three of us agree on something, it well end up at the supreme court. undoubtedly. let s do it and get it there and rule 11 applies there. we agree gregg: there s a reason by eric holder doesn t want it to go to the u.s. supreme court and the court of appeals first. he knows he ll lose it. justice canada is this swing, and you have four conservatives and four liberals and kennedy is the swing and kennedy he thinks will swing against him. it is unlikely the court will ....
Imperative public importance? come on, it is not just the mandate, it is small businesses and insurance companies making decisions today in 2011, even though the mandate itself doesn t go into effect until 2014. and, another case you didn t cite was mizenretta, the sentencing guidelines case and to my, constitutionality was an issue there, were the sentencing guidelines constitutional and here is that individual mandate constitutional and i think we need to decide that. gregg: i interviewed a guy sitting in that chair 3-4 months ago and he had a letter front insurance cap that said in relevant part your insurance company said your insurance is going up 50% in part because of the new health care law and it is impacting people, already. but whatever the judges have said, it is always looking at the immediate economic impact and, what is the irreparable harm and you know here it es when the mandate kicks in and ....