to marijuana possession. that s not really a big issue anymore. close those cases. no reason to deport those people when in many stays it s legal. any case opened for five years which is the general statute of limitations, let those individuals go. if you haven t taken action against them in five years, that s a regulatory time and just time to say we re not going to move on those cases anymore so let s move away from those cases. anyone with a end abouting case for relief bucis, why are we dealing with those cases? back during the former administration he opened 330,000 cases just on a whim to punish people. let s close those cases immediately and then we re back down to under around a million bases on the numbers that i just gave you, and while we re doing that lets do exactly what representative lofgren did last week saying let s move the immigration reports away from the department of justice. make them a free standing court which will give them the discretion to do what they need
don t deal with that kind of petty nonsense. welcome back. as we have been talking about, secretary tillerson calling president trump, a quote, moron, raises the question whether the secretary can keep his job after public learns he may have spoken disparagingly about the commander in chief. this is not the first time his discontent has been reported. politico reported tillerson blew up at a top white house aide, frustrated about delays in appointing staff. days later, they reported he argued with steven miller over immigration reports. in july, cnn reported two of their sources said they would not be surprised if there was a, quote, rexit from foggy bottom. state department has pushed back on all of this, but today s reporting didn t come on a silo. he said he would continue to serve, but in recent history, leaders have left their jobs over snide words about an
them back to mexico or other countries where they came from. anna, you know this law better than most. any shot that juan montez s attorneys can get him back to the united states? it s very difficult once the person has left the united states, and there may be a shot, but it s not clear what that path would be. and especially probably an underreported part of this story is the immigration bureaucracy from the federal and immigration courts are jam packed. there s 500,000 backlog in the immigration reports alone. even if his attorneys refiled, we don t know when it would get in front of a judge. all right. thank you both for your time this afternoon. thank you. some live pictures right now from 1600 pennsylvania avenue. it s a whole heck of a lot of hardware. pats fans love to see that. the new england patriots at the
alive. the president go it alone as opposed to president let s work together, we might actually is we had a president who worked together, we had a senate that worked together. everybody worked together. the only people that are preventing any bipartisan legislation from passing were the republican head led house of representatives. that s not true. of course it is. hundreds of bills never introduce on immigration? on immigration? a ton of on immigration? immigrants have to learn english, no the getting drivers a licenses. that is your comprehensive immigration reports? those are good to start w. start to at least try to find some bipartisan start. take up a senate bill, bipartisan bill, take it up. they very well may do that. guys, got to go. time to check in shepard smith reporting live from the fox news deck. can a company cut off pay to a pregnant woman who needs to take it easy if they don t do the same thing for other workers who require ligh
they re going after bad countries like north korea, potentially china. and then of course the immigration reports. dismantling the organization that smuggle people into the u.s. pete: groups like ms-13 that the president talks about. let me go to you al, you re an you have talked to what i ve read about structural reform to ice as opposed to abolishing it. the rhetoric on the left is abolish. what is a difference? there is a huge difference. the show guests show the issue you want put forward. before there was ice, there was ins. we still protect our borders. this conversation about abolish ice, it is more of a political french on both ends of the part party. at sun about a political conversation. pete: what is the political french on the right?