bill clinton should not have gotten on that plane. tell me why donald trump can summon everyone to the white house and demand documents. tell me we deserve to know who s investigating all the trump people. the investigation is under way. do you think the witnesses should have ax to the information that they may be taken to court? that s witness tampering. from everything we saw in 2016, that absolutely need to happen. is this department of justice basically folding to his pressure? i think what the deputy attorney general did today or yesterday i forget when the meeting happened. so much has happened. i think he tried to buy himself some time and he didn t want to be on the receiving end of the president s twitter account. he did fold. this is a dangerous president. you do what he says. you start the investigation, kick it to the inspector general. what s to top the president from
going come up with conclusions in 30, 60, 90 days. i don t think the inspector general will be done by then. if mueller comes out and says, here s indictments or no indictments this investigation becomes irrelevant. i think that s why this might be a punt. so do you see this as a punt? something that won t go anywhere because there may be results for muler? the language is so beg and broad. we didn t see a statement from mueller today. the doj are not giving their opinion on this. i don t think it s a punt in the sense that the ig investigation isn t a real investigation, but there s also an investigation. texas expanding at the margins. the substantive difference from this morning is of timing and redirecting the president. there s a great deal to
based on what? exactly. george papadopoulos was bragging to foreign officials. you have three fringe players and you have this helper guy, they call him the wall russ. first of all, i want to know who s paying this guy, how much he was paid, who directed him. he s running a outright entrapment evident. are you willing to acknowledge the understood lying that may have led the fbi to approach him to start an investigation? why is he spying on a u.s. campaign. and my question about george papadopoulos telling australians he s the fringe so they have not looked into that. this seeps jay the revelation that bill clinton meeting on the tarmac. give me a break. what about hillary s deal?
hill. every question from a republican senator was, loretta, will you stand up to the president if he directs you to do an investigation. she said, yes, i will stand up. similarly, justice officials who have gone up have made the same promise, so it seem like this norm has been made until today. there s a difference though. there s a difference in saying how you will investigate and will you investigate. and my answer to your question was, will he investigate. i think any time there s a necessity or unanswered questions, the answer should be of course. now what i wouldn t support he didn t ask, he demanded. welsh that s fine. either way. but the second part was to say, this is how you will investigate. that s a very different question, of course which i would support. i need someone over here on my side. you re doing a good job. one more question and then we
rosen teen and director wright, trying to protect him from his impulses. he made a vague tweet. trying to tell them to proceed without a predicate. that would be serious, conquenchle. they said, we ll handle this through the normal ig process. i think we are ignoring the context. at the same time this investigation was going on, you have also got susan rice unmasking trump campaign members using her authority in the obama administration. you have comey than as fbi director essentially preclears hillary clinton before they interview her. there are a lot of other thing that is don t look right in the time period on the law enforcement side. i m as pro-law enforcement as anybody, but they sacrificed their about jektivity in this