Stay updated with breaking news from Hypothatical. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Drivers behind the work i m doing and why i m pushing so hard. president zelenskyy is asking for the u.s. and other nations to be guarntors if there s any ceasefire agreement with vladimir putin. doesn t that suggest sest that if you re going to guarantee putin s not invading again, that you have to have boots on the ground, more engagement than right now, which is exactly what it could suggest that in the long term. i think that s purely hypothatical. i ve not seen any evidence that he s negotiating in good faith. that does not mean we don t try. president zelenskyy has an obligation to do that for his people. i see no indication that vladimir putin is going to do anything other than continue to commit war crimes and kill innocent civilians and devastate ukrainian cities. we operate under the assumption nothing is going to change. ....
On the supreme court a have decided we discovered a new right and it shall be the law of the land and no legislature can passby law that conflicts. what other rights are out there or can you say? senator, i can t say. it s a hypothatical that i m not in a position to comment on. there the rights that the supreme court has recognized as substantive due process rights are established in its case law. your honor, this is not a trick question. i understand. i m not in a position to speak to the can you understand why ....
0 of marriage, correct? i am aware there are various religious faiths that define marriage in a traditional way. do you see that when the supreme court makes a dramatic pronouncement about the invalidity about state marriage laws, it will inevitably set in conflict between those who ascribe to the supreme court s edict and those who have a firmly held religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman? well, senator, these issues are being litigated, as you know, throughout the courts i as people raise issues and so, i m limited in what i can say about them. i m aware there are cases i m not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide in the future. i m asking isn t it apparent that when the supreme court decided something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court s edict, particularly in an area where people have sincerely held religious believes, doesn t that effec ....
Budget problem in a business where there was a shortfall, one of the things he would suggest 1 ways to raise the revenue going into that business. it never occurred to him, in talking to you, that one solution to the problem of someone working at his bank at the low wages you identified, would have been, for him to raise the pay of that person. and to be fair, i don t know if that occurred to him and he simply wasn t willing to admit it. some of his competter banks-just announced pay raises up to $20 an hour. and the hypothatical example, the mother earning 1650. i don t know if it crossed his mind and he simply didn t want to admit it or if it didn t occur to him that the most obvious way to help a family make ends meet is to give them a share of the volume their company helped creating. ....
Figure than he was. what he s saying is i feel guilty because i m seeing the result of enabling somebody unethical, lawless and it destructful. that s not a hypothatical. it s we ve already been going on. the republican party, up until this point at the feet of mitch mcconnell and paul ryan. both of them essentially put their institutional powers, in checks and balances at the feet of donald trump. so susan, pick up on that point because you re around politicians. you know the incentive system. so this question about why won t republicans uncongress do x do y . in term oz of their motivations. in terms of understanding the ....