issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
smerconish in philadelphia. in september of 2019, joe biden was asked how many$#ursqj he ha spoken to son hunter about his overseas business activities. the then candidate s answer a was this. i have never spoken to my son about that. that has remained his answer until this week. on monday white house press secretary was asked about this issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer remains the same. but in fact the first time instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman pointed out the insistent sit, but she insisted the answer was the same. i just want to clear this up once if and are all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with
Give me bob lazar. and then maybe those numbers will be flipped. reaction to this week s program. what else do we have? you will only read republican talking points because you re a right wing fascist low life. i guess that sums it up. tom, you got me. what else? give me something i can really respond to. unbelievable. smerconish should rename his show the hunter biden hour. he s devoted an inordinate amount of time to something of little substance. i walked through the public record as best i could in the span of five or ten minutes at the outset of the program. the issue warrants our attention. those two irs whistleblowers, one of whom on the program earlier in the hour, i found to be very credible. and the president s one-word answer of never, it never passed
Grusch. from the world of social media you will only read republican talking points because you re a right-wing fascist low life. i guess i guess that sums it up. yeah, tom. you got me. what else? give me something i can really respond to. unbelievable. jeff, smerconish should rename his show the hunter biden hour. he can protest all he wants, but he s devoted an inordinate amount of time to something with little substance. hearsay is not evidence. i tried for five or ten minutes at the outset of the program. the issue warrants our attention. those whistleblowers, one of whom was on earlier in the hour, i found to be very credible. the president s one-word answer of never, it never passed the