knowledge of the document tell us it included three federal statutes, deprivation of rights under color of law, conspiracy to defraud the united states, and tampering with a witness. we ll explain what those all mean and why this testimony, this particular testimony from the january 6th hearings could be relevant. ms. moss, how has this experience of being targeted by the former president and his allies affected your life? it s turned my life upside down. i no longer give out my business card. i don t transfer calls. i don t want anyone knowing my name. i don t want to go anywhere with my mom, because she might yell my name out over the grocery aisle or something. i don t go to the grocery store at all. i haven t been anywhere at all. i ve gained about 60 pounds. i just don t nothing anymore. i don t want to go anywhere. i second guess everything that i do. it s affected my life in a major way. in every way. all because of lies. for me doing my job, same thing i have been
Disappeared. from that point, our focus has been to determine carlee s whereabouts during that time and what exactly took place. let me say up front, this investigation is not over. we re still working this case, and we re working this case until we uncover every piece of evidence that helps us account for the 49 hours that carlee russell was missing. however, through the public interest in some cases, public fear, that this story has generated, we owe it to our citizens to tell them the facts that we have uncovered. i will give you the facts that we know today. on july 13th, at approximately 8:20 p.m., carlee left work from a business at the summit. surveillance video from her place of employment shows carlee concealed a dark colored bathrobe, a roll of toilet paper and other items belonging to the business prior to her departure. she ordered food and traveled there. she then traveled to target on 280 where she purchased some
In lansing, not in the state capitol where the law clearly says these documents need to be signed. we know several officials including one of my predecessors to the former secretary of state was asked to be a part of the scheme and declined because she knew of the wrong doing. that should have been a sign to folks when that occurred that something was awry. there are a lot of indicators along the way that we publicly know of, and now that these indictments will proceed, the subsequent legal process i think will flesh out exactly who knew what and when. as the ag said, this investigation is ongoing. if there are other individuals who are culpable of breaking election law in this case and trying to undo the will of the voter, i have confidence she ll chase the facts and make sure everyone is brought to account. do you have a sense of who might have been directing this, whether there was somebody in the white house who might have been directing this or somebody affiliated with the white
we don t know why. what could be the reason? why would jack smith show up? there could be a number of reasons. there could be a grand jury relating to either the january 6th or election interference investigation or the records investigation meeting and a witness from whom jack smith wanted to hear. there could also have been some form of sealed hearing about evidence in one of those two cases that jack smith wanted to be present for. we know that he was there for roughly an hour and a half. and then returned to his office. but, again, why he was there? we can only speculate as to right now. do we have an idea of when this could potentially come? i know donald trump was talking about being indicted within four days, which would be friday. are we getting any indication friday could be a big day? the four-day reference is mentioning when he could come in, if he was going to provide testimony, which we knew he wasn t. it would have been news if he had decided to come in. that wo
For his presidential campaign. who s william russell, garrett? refs a white house aide when donald trump was president. he works for donald trump in a campaign aide role. he s not a major player in all of this, and in fact, wasn t somebody who appeared in the january 6th committee s report. we know he s testified multiple times before this committee, so we re left to speculate on what he knows, what he might have overheard or what his role in this would be. but, again, not somebody who would have been privy to, you know, internal machinations of the campaign or white house by design, but perhaps someone who might have heard something that could be relevant to this investigation, just given his proximity to then president now candidate trump. so we are watching the d.c. courthouse hawkishly, right, ladies, as we have all of the other courthouses, including this one, surrounding this investigation and this probe. jack smith was there today. we don t know why.