just say, your point is that there s no ambiguity with having a list and not having president in it with having a history that suggests they were really focussed on local concerns in the south, with this conversation where the legislators actually discussed what looked like an ambiguity, you are saying there s no ambiguity in section 3? let me take the point specifically about electors and senators, if i might. yes. that might be important. presidential electors were not covered, because they don t hold an office. they vote. i m talking about the barred office part of this. exactly. the barred if you want to include everybody, first you have to suppress phi presidential electors. they wouldn t fall under any office. secretary of all, senators and representatives don t hold office either. the constitution tells us that and refers to them as holding seats, not offices. you want to make sure there s no doubt that senators and representatives are covered given the con
times. justice jackson: no. i m not going to that. let me just say so your point is that there is no ambiguity with having a list and not having president in it with having a history that suggest that they were really focused on local concerns in the south with this conversation where the legislators actually discussed you are saying there is no they vote. justice jackson: i m talking about the barred office part of this. jason murray: barred office is if you want to include everybody first presidential electors they are not offices so they wouldn t fall under any office. second of all senators and representatives don t hold office either. the tells us under the incompatibility clause refers to them as holding seats not offices. you want to make sure there is no doubt that senators and representatives are covered given that the constitution suggests otherwise, you have to include them. the constitution says the presidency holds an office as do members of this court. and
tonight on all in. the cardinal sin appears to be that i lead the impeachment of his master in mar-a-lago. bipartisan outrage as the mogollon rim s exact revenge on democrats. it is a hypocrisy. kevin mccarthy has some concern. we have an ethics committee. tonight, congresswoman on kevin mccarthy s attempt to take her committee seat away. if mccarthy wants to denigrate, the integrity of the house. and it s committees. we will always stand up to these efforts. then, marjorie taylor greene to lead the new house committee to attack science. plus, a new mission from george santos about the questionable source of campaign funds. and his decision looming in georgia. andrew weissmann, when we might expect justice for donald trump. when all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i am chris hayes. kevin mccarthy and his maga republican congress are gearing up for their first high stakes floor vote since the election for speaker. in case you ve forgotten. or b
Muslim community is large and has been felt deeply and we are now seeing the electoral consequence. We have warned that it Muslim Population areas, wards, councils and constituencies of high Muslim Population areas, the position in gaza will have a serious electoral consequence and we are seeing that unfolds across the country. We consequence and we are seeing that unfolds across the country. Unfolds across the country. We are seeinu it unfolds across the country. We are seeing it here unfolds across the country. We are seeing it here clearly unfolds across the country. We are seeing it here clearly in unfolds across the country. We are seeing it here clearly in the unfolds across the country. We are seeing it here clearly in the local. Seeing it here clearly in the local elections, only a few results in, we do not want to exaggerate anything, but what potential impact do you think it could have on a General Election . I think it could have on a General Election . , think it could have
mccarthy set the precedent that there is a line that you cannot cross. and remain a member of good standing. holding seats on house committees. made it clear that those kinds of views are unacceptable. at least they wanted to make it clear. or sort of. two years later. democrats than a majority, followed on the cover mccarthy. they held votes on removing republicans marjorie taylor greene and paul gosar from their committees after both used violent rhetoric to directed at their own colleagues. congressman gosar of arizona posted this and it may video. depicting a character with his face attacking characters with the faces of congresswoman alexandra acosta cortez and presidential. when marjorie taylor greene repeatedly made comments about executing democratic politicians. including then speaker nancy pelosi. she is a traitor to our country. she is guilty of treason. she took an oath to protect american citizens and uphold our laws. and she gives aid and comfort