Ban. Yeah, absolutely. Allows abortions if situations where patients are failing not close enough to say that its necessary to prevent death. And that means that these patients are left in that gap. Meghan mentioned. And i mean, just ask the obvious question here. This world did not exist before roe was overturned. Absolutely. Right. Part of the challenges, the meaning of the statute, this federal statute that protects people in emergencies. And idaho is trying to say that this is a new problem that the federal government is is creating the rules. But in fact, this has always been the treatment for abortions or sometimes the treatment for these kinds of conditions. Its just that it wasnt banned before. Dobbs has changed the landscape. Its not that emtala has changed. Its that emtala plays out differently. Now the dobbs allows abortions to be bound with very strict are no exceptions for health. Ryan follow dobbs who was supposed to the intent of dobbs of send it back to the states. And
kids from the parents they called them unaccompanied minors and were sent into hhs. jus as if they arrived without parents. they didn t therefore hhs didn t have the information about parents. they have had great difficulty figuring this out. that s why after here after two weeks of still only 50 kids a few more will be connected. this was really poorly planned. all the way through. here s just the fundamental fact. let s not forget the administration reunifies the kids, they are insisting on a strategy of inflicting trama on children in order to push a policy of deterrence. to deter people from coming to america to assert asylum. that idea of inflicting trama on children is a dark, dark position. no religious tradition. no moral code would allow you to
enterprise institute about justin rhenquist. he talked about rhenquist s dissent in roe v. wade, and why he respected it at the time. he may have boxed himself in. we ll be talking about it a lot in the weeks ahead. i want to talk to you about something else, these kids are still separated well over 90% of the ones that the government has stripped from parents. they are going to miss the deadline that is court imposed. do you believe in your findings that the government has made the strides it needs to to create a process of putting these families back together? well, absolutely not. they are in a great state of confusion. that is why tomorrow is the deadline for the children who are under five. there were just over a hundred of those children. we are hearing that maybe half of them will be reunited with their parents. they called them unaccompanied minors, and they were sent into hhs, health and human services, just as if they had arrived without their parents. they didn t therefo
i think it s shocking to hear, but it s absolutely true. and the way they were able to do that, chris, was by dehumanizing a group of people. by the president calling them animals or infestations, that is what you do with when you want to dehumanize a group of people is you do these things and then you can do whatever you want to them, which is absolutely abhorrent and immoral, and it set us into a human teatarian crisis. there is more than 90% of them who are still somewhere around the country that is true. we don t know where, and tomorrow the deadline was to reunify the tender age kids under five years old, 101 of them, we found out last week that 38 of them had parents, 19 of them had been deported. the other 19 did, the administration doesn t know where they are, because they were released and didn t keep track of them. when i get a ups package, i
didn t have the facility set up. and had to separate them. just like they do again when somebody is arrested tonight in brooklyn for shoplifting. not true. they have their children and handcuffed. the children are taken. they re not taken to jail. you know that. i know that s not true. it s not true. they look for next of kin. who else is in the household. how long they ll hold the person. sometimes a misdemeanor like shoplifting. if there s no one there they get taken into child services. they know where the kid is. if the kid gets put into the system. you know where they are. here you don t. i wonder why. why isn t it just them not giving a damn. they want it to be a message of deterrence. which is what you said. the original intent of zero