Latest Breaking News On - Heritage energy model - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Time to Unlock America's Vast Oil and Gas Resources | The Heritage Foundation

EPA Power Plant Regulations: A Backdoor Energy Tax

Boxer–Sanders Carbon Tax Would Empower EPA to Crush Booming Energy Economy

The Climate Protection Act of 2013 (Boxer–Sanders bill) would inflict high costs on families, especially those in carbon-intensive states; thwart promising energy investment and development; destroy manufacturing jobs; risk triggering a trade war; waste money; fail to provide environmental benefits; and impose a massive tax and leave a command-and-control regulatory regime in place for greenhouse gas emissions.

Consequences of Paris Protocol: Devastating Economic Costs, Essentially Zero Environmental Benefits

During the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, President Barack Obama met with world leaders from around the globe to discuss plans to combat climate change. The general consensus from the summit was that the use of natural resources, such as coal, oil, and natural gas which provide 80 percent of the world’s energy needs should be avoided. Furthermore, industrialized, rich countries should pay for poor countries to build more renewable power and address climate change.

The Many Problems of the EPA's Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

This summer, the Obama Administration will finalize climate regulations for new and existing power plants under the Clean Air Act. While the regulations largely target coal-fired power plants, the costs of more expensive energy will be borne by all Americans. Higher energy bills for families, individuals, and businesses will destroy jobs and strain economic growth and it will all be for naught. No matter one’s belief on the climate effects of man-made greenhouse emissions, the regulations will have a negligible impact if any on global temperatures.