Stay updated with breaking news from Hearron. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
today marks 82 years since the japanese attack on pearl harbor, launching the u.s. into world war ii. and a 103 year old veteran, ira ike schab, made his way to hawaii. schab was the eldest of five other survivors on hand. as every year, there was a moment of silence at that moment the first bombs fell. 2300 service men were killed in the attack, a day president roosevelt family said will live in infamy. that s it for us. the news continues. the source with kaitlan collins starts now. see you tomorrow. straight from the source. donald trump in court today, as he prepares to take the stand again. as one of his own lawyers is acknowledging she s telling him not to do it. plus, a judge granting one woman an emergency abortion request in texas, the first case of its time since the fall of roe v. wade. but tonight, the texas attorney general is threatening to go after her doctor. also, we re following dramatic new images coming out of gaza as israel is rounding up ....
Against enforcement, because the law is patently unconstitutional and if these are the correct defendants, then enforcement should flow. so we would ask the court to issue such interim relief. thank you, mr. hearron. would the chief permit me a follow-up on that? sure. counsel, if we vacate the fifth circuit s order or orders basically staying the district court proceedings, presumably, that would vacate its denial of the state that it has asked from the district court order. we reinstated the district court order, you would have a stay in place, wouldn t you? technically, there are two stays in play. one that was around by the district court, and if you were to vacate those in the interim, we would be able to go back and ask for an interim relief in the district court. would you grant a stay of enforcement of the law? ....
It s an enforcer, being used as an enforcer. i agree with that, your honor. but your honor, here, the point is that regardless of the outcome of the case, it is the threat of filing an unlimited number of cases in counties all across the state where there is no preclusive effect, and where the state has even made it where are difficult to get an attorney, by making attorneys liable for fees for the other side s fees. mr. hearron all of that creates a threat keep going, i m sorry. the combination of all of those factors together creates a chilling effect and that under this court s presence is an irreparable injury. can we talk about ex parte young a little bit. you make the point correctly, that usually, you can get preenforcement review in federal court when it s enforced, a law is enforced by a state ....
i presume that any other lawsuit based on common law torts, emotional affliction of harm, breach of contract, medical malpractice, whatever else was available would still be available to that woman? if there is a common law tort lawsuit, that is not an sb-8 lawsuit, yes. common law. yes. justice kagan? mr. hearron, if you could turn technical for a minute, should one of your arguments prevail or another argument in support of your position prevail, doesn t matter exactly which argument it is to me, what exact relief are you requesting? we are requesting an injunction so we have a pending class certification motion for a defendant class against the clerks. so we would be requesting an injunction against the ....
0 weeks. lindsey? gabe gutierrez, thank you. and in just seconds, we ll take you inside the supreme court to hear arguments in two challenges to the texas abortion law. i m lindsey reiser in for stephanie ruhle. jose diaz-balart picks up the coverage right now. good morning. it s 10:00 a.m. eastern, 7:00 a.m. pacific. i m jose diaz-balart. and we begin with something that hasn t happened before. for the first time ever, msnbc will bring you live oral arguments from the u.s. supreme court as it takes up two cases stemming from the controversial texas abortion law. this will be audio only, as the supreme court does not allow television cameras. the first case is whole women s health versus jackson. it was filed by abortion providers, challenging a law that effectively bans abortions in texas and shifts enforcement from the state to private citizens who can sue anyone seeking an abortion or anyone who helps a woman obtain one. with me now so break this all down, nbc news corresponde ....