Hello and a warm welcome to our viewers joining us in the united states and all around the world. i m max foster joining you from london. ahead on cnn newsroom. the investigation into the alaska airline flight has a new spoke ing smoking gun. we re going to send components back to our lab in d.c. for further examination. the republican front run former president trump is urging his supporters not to grow complacent. can we endure another four years of donald trump. u.s. secretary of state antony blinken is set to meet with top israeli officials including benjamin netanyahu. it s clearly not in the interest of anyone to see this escalate.
In new hampshire. look at the growth over time in our poll as well, and you see that nikki haley s momentum that we ve been talking about for weeks in this campaign is apparent here as well. she s increased her share of the vote by 12 points. she was at 20% in our november poll. she s at 32% now. you see trump has moved very little. in fact, he s been remarkably stable throughout this entire campaign in new hampshire. so that movement is exactly what the trump team is trying to blunt as they try to get away with two early state victories and actually hasten their path to the nomination. how does she fare in this poll with undecided voters in new hampshire versus trump? so not undecided but undeclared is what they call independents, poppy. i think this is such an important point. take a look at the breakdown between registered republicans and registered undeclareds. among republican s trump s at 58%, haley s at 21%. among the independents who in
Incredibly cold on caucus day. that could impact voters if they want to go out to the polls or if they are able to get to the polls. that s something the campaigns will have to consider. one person says she s extremely worried about the 2024 election is former first lady michelle obama. she didn t mention donald trump be by name, but it seems fairly clear that might be who she s talking about. what s going to happen in the next election? i m terrified about what could possibly happen. because our leaders matter. who we select, who speaks for us, who holds that bully pulpit, it affects us in ways that sometimes i think people the take for granted. the former first lady also suggested there s a double standard when it comes to trump s legal entanglements saying the bar is different for black people. a massive winter storm bringing severe weather threats to the u.s.
Blinken will meet with benjamin netanyahu and the war cabinet to discuss the next phase in the campaign in gaza. earlier blinken met with the israeli president and foreign minister. donald trump would attend a hearing on whether he has presidential immunity in the federal lx subversion case. trump wants the appeals court to overturn a lower court ruling rejecting his claims of immunity. despite weeks of talks, u.s. congressional negotiators have apparently made little progress on a border security deal. the hope was that the text for a come promiezed bill would be released. the impasse means no new funding for cukraine and israel. since republicans insisted that foreign aid be paired with major changes aimed at securing the southern border. the world is not when or how but whether the world is ready
Trying to tilt it his own way. the other problem i think trump s going to face and i think this is a hypothetical that his lawyers ought to be ready for, what if a president s doing something within the scope of the office, within those outer boundary, but it s criminal. i guess i would pose this to david. what if a president, hypothetically took a cash bribe in exchange for issues a veto of legislation, right? that would be within the scope of the office, you issue vetoes. or a pardon. or a pardon, right? what if there was an exchange of a cash bribe for that. it will be within the scope, would a president be immune for that exact conduct? i think two answers. one is if he were still in office, he wouldn t be prosecuted under the justice department policy. if he were out of office, i think that he could be because i don t think it would be an official act. while taken within the scope of office, i don t think it would be an official act covered by this concept of immunity in any