Happening now, breaking news. A new Protective Order just issued 8020 20 election interference case against donald trump. The judge, barring the former president and his lawyers from publicly disclosing Sensitive Information. Also tonight, as the flames ease and the death toll is expected to keep rising, we are getting uptotheminute accounts of the damage from the Wildfire Disaster in hawaii. Cnn is of course on the scene. And the Hawaii Governor will join us live with all the latest developments. And the top prosecutor in the Hunter Biden Probe is elevated to Special Counsel as the president son now appears headed to trial. We are breaking down the legal implications and the political fallout. Welcome to our viewers here in the United States and around the world. I am wolf blitzer and you are in the Situation Room. This is cnn breaking news. Lets get right to it. Coming out of the first hearing before the judge in the trump election interference case. Cnn justice correspondent is on t
keeps our democracy in place. and thanks to you at home for joining me this evening. in february of 2021 joe biden had been president for less than a month. the united states senate was still in the middle of impeaching the previous president for stoking insurrection. the house impeachment managers, all of them democrats, were making the case that even though trump was no longer president, he had to be impeached because otherwise future presidents would be free to commit any crime or misdemeanor as long as they did so right before leaving office. to rebut that trump s lawyers offered this counter argument. if my colleague on this side of the chamber actually think that president trump committed a criminal offense and let s understand a high crime is a felony and a misdemeanor is a misdemeanor. the words haven t changed that much over time. after he s out of office you go and arrest him. so there is no opportunity where the president of the united states can run rampant in
to be generate six of 2021, and if he were to be charged with sedition or insurrection, there are even more serious insurrection, there are even more serious consequences, and if he were to be serious consequences, and if he were to be charged with sedition or insurrection, there are even more serious insurrection, there are even more serious consequences constitutional questions serious consequences constitutional questions january 6. anyone who has pledged questions january 6. anyone who has pledged a oath of loyalty and given has pledged a oath of loyalty and given aid has pledged a oath of loyalty and given aid or comfort to an insurrection is barred from public office insurrection is barred from public office and insurrection is barred from public office. and that is under the constitution, so these charges might not be constitution, so these charges might not be disqualifying, they are not mentioned in the constitution, with respect mentione
and i pray to god. i say, you know, i don t wan to live. it was a crime that engulfe the city, a young touris murdered he was stabbed trying to protect his mother we had to get everyone. seven teams convicted one says he s innocent you don t have to believe me look at the facts in this case now we are doing just tha tracking down witnesses. he was shaking. he started crying revisiting evidence - the most emotional thing wa reading the letter is he telling the truth or lying to win his freedom? we are about to find out this is a perry mason moment right, she s a surprise t everyone hello, and welcome to dateline in the late 19 80s, robberies, muggings, and even murders wer a sad reality of life in new york city. then, in 1990, a tourist was stabbed while trying to protec his family the public demanded action and then got it. police made arrests and pu suspects behind bars but one of the man convicted said he wasn t there was an innocent man in jail
it is light beer so y all would be fine. [applause] great to see everybody. sean, great show. i love you, too. have a great show. i am laura ingraham. this is the angle tonight. the tiktok party. mr. china came to washington today and it was quite spectacle. we have heard important concerns of unwanted foreign access u.s. data and potential manipulation of the tiktok u.s. system. our approach have never been dismissed of any of these concerns. can you do surveillance of other americans? we ll protect the u.s. user data and fire it off of foreign access is the commitment we give to the committee. i want to hear you say that neither tiktok employees can target americans with similar techniques as you did with the journalists. i don t agree with the characterization. that s a commitment that we ll not be influenced with any government. the doj is investigating this surveillance right now. a ban is a short way to address tiktok. the data privacy is the only way