Live Breaking News & Updates on Health Insurance Exchange
Stay updated with breaking news from Health insurance exchange. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The funds reinstate the evictions to prevent even bigger housing crisis . Mr. Speaker. The senate is grappling back into session and we continue to watch for ministers just need time at cspan. Org. Now live to the senate floor here on cspan2. Mr. Lankford mr. President. I have three requests for committees to meet during todays session of the senate. They have the approval of the majority and minority leaders. The presiding officer duly noted. Mr. Lankford mr. President , we are once again in a conversation about freedom of religion and the free exercise of religion and what that means. There is simply i would argue that it means the ability to have any faith, to have no faith at all, change your faith, and to be able to live it out. The ability to have a faith as a part of who we are. Its our most precious possession within us. Its not that. If its something less than that, the free exercise of religion has limitations on it, then its simply the freedom to worship or to have a name fa ....
Future. And the Nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has told us that the houses proposal will not generate sustainability of Pension Plans or the sustainability of the pbgc. So we better not spend time on something the Congressional Budget Office just isnt going to bring a solution and definitely not a longterm solution. In contrast, the proposal that senator alexander and i are releasing today addresses the immediate needs of the few multiemployer plans facing immediate crisis in a manner that protects participant benefits and also ensures a sustainable multiemployer Pension System for the long haul. And it does this all in a fiscally responsible way. Our proposal is not a giveaway to corporations or to unions, and its a bet ....
Participants raised their hands and said yes. Thats an arguable position. There are arguments for and against that. But the first question you need to answer in this as in any other policy proposal is what is this going to cost. And there simply hasnt been very much interest or exploration in this question x. So thats why were releasing the two papers were releasing today and having this panel discussion, is precisely to get a sense of what it could cost us. Not definitive, these are estimates. Maybe theyll be different. Other people have other estimates. Wed love to see them, but nobody really has offered some concrete examination of what the consequences for taxpayers would be of these proposals. And so today were going to be, were releasing two papers to look at that. The first is a look at what the current cost to taxpayers are of, under current policy. The second is what the likely under a couple different scenarios costs would be. And this is a topic that needs to be injected int ....
Good morning, my name is mark, director for the center for Immigration Studies and the democrats in one of their debates this summer were asked whether the taxpayer should Fund Health Care for Illegal Immigrants and all 10 participants raised their hand and said yes. Thats an arguable position, there are arguments you can make for and against that, but the first question you need to answer in this, as in any other policy proposal, is what is this going to cost . And there simply hasnt been very much interest or exploration in this question and so thats why were releasing the twopapers were releasing today and having this panel discussion, is precisely to get a sense of what it could cost us. Not definitive. These are estimates, maybe theyll be different. Other people have other estimates. Wed love to see them, ....
Good morning, my name is mark, mark good morning. My name is mark, executive director for the center for immigration studies, and the democrats in one of their debates this summer were asked whether the taxpayer should Fund Health Care for Illegal Immigrants and all 10 participants raised their hand and said yes. Thats an arguable position, there are arguments you can make for and against that, but the first question you need to answer in this, as in any other policy proposal, is what is this going to cost . And there simply hasnt been very much interest or exploration in this question and so thats why were releasing the twopapers were releasing today and having this panel discussion, is precisely to get a sense of what it could cost us. Not definitive. These are estimates. Maybe they will be different. Other people have other estimates. We would love to see them, but n ....