issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
Credentials in this field, as poed in the new york times, on january 8 of 2014, a fireball from space blazed lu rth s atmosphere and crashed into the sea north off the northeastern coast of new guinea. its location, velocity and brightness were recorded by u.s. government sensors and quietly tucked away in a database of similar events. last month harvard theoretical astrophysicist led an expedition that retrieved metallic fragments of the fireball off the western pacific sea floor. he joins me now, the head of the project and founding director of harvard university s black hole initiative. he s the best-selling arthur of extra ter rreshrial. do you believe the government is in possession of alien