Phil mattingly, thank you so much. Dana bash who used to run up and down those halls for years and years and years. Phil has talked to folks on both sides of the aisle. Confident that the house will get to this and nancy pelosi was so key in brokering this deal why is she standing there now for fourplus hours and saying no . I saw you write that down and because youre you, is why you picked up what you did about nancy pelosi. To people at home, it makes no sense. Not at all. Because shes getting attention for the issue shes upset is not in there. She understood because she is as sort of seasoned and tough as a legislator as they come, that at the end of the day, we saw what happened in the senate a few weeks ago. They tried to use the Immigration Issue as leverage for keeping the government open and it didnt work. Shut the government down. It didnt work out so politically, at least in the short term, for democrats. Nancy pelosi is making using the megaphone that she has by saying, you
Controle o desempenho do PC em tempo real pcguia.pt - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pcguia.pt Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the law or is the law above the president. do you see congress doing upholding its role of being the checks and balances on the president s power effectively? let me put it this way. i think when historians look back at this 50 years from now like we re looking back at watergate now, historians are going to wonder about checks and balances precisely. they re going to wonder why for so many people this is a partisan issue rather than an issue of the rule of congress and looking after the basic interests of the u.s. let me ask you about another thing the president wanted to do this week. he talked about a military parade, and this is what lindsey graham said about this idea. i don t mind having a parade honoring the service and sacrifice of our military members. i m not looking for a soviet style hardware display. that s not who we are. that s kind of cheesy, and i think it shows weakness, quite frankly. so timothy, we heard lindsey graham bring up russia in that. why do you
white house briefing which was unusual in and of itself says it reflects the president s affection for the troops and the pentagon is looking for alternatives for the parade through the national s capital. i m putting together options. the president s fondness for the military reflected in him asking for these options. congressional democrats are opposed to the idea. republicans appear mixed. here is one senator lindsey graham. i don t have a problem with the parade honoring the service. i m not looking for a soviet style hardware display. that shows weakness. leon panetta saying any other president you would assume to
spending has gone up. that is something they have been pushing for. you take the budget off the table in some ways for a long time. that would be a huge victory. the question is will the house republicans coalesce behind the president and put the fiscal conservatism aside? when the obama administration had trillion dollar deficits, it was evil and the end of the world. when republicans have trillion dollar deficits, it is okay? that is correct. fiscal conservatism is set aside when your party is committing the deficit. you can spend more money on a parade. what do you make of the military parade? we had military parades after specific military conflicts like world war ii or the persian gulf. at the same time, we have the parades to honor veterans. many people think trump is enamored with the hardware display.