supposed to have a vast majority point. what we ve done is mistaken or substituted an even handedness for neutrality, meaning you would treat things that are fundamentally dissimilar as if they re the same in the name of objectivity, but what that actually does is normalize the thing that has become unusual. in this case we ve seen a number of things, an ray of things, we could create a catalog of things that are not just outside the norms of politics, but actually detrimental, ennem cal to democracy to this country by the widest understanding of it. when we look where we stand on the democracy index and see our numbers complaining, what we would consider flawed democracy, things that are not in dispute, these are not partisan elements here. the media should approach this with that sort of critical eye , that we should not give platforms to people who are
how coverage has changed. the first is that it is absolutely true that we re supposed to have a vantage point. what we ve done is mistaken or substituted a kind of even-handedness for neutrality, meaning that you would treat things that are fundamentally dissimilar as if they re the same in the name of objectivity. but what that actually does is normalize the thing that has become unusual. in this case, we ve seen a number of things, an array of things. we could create a catalog of things that are not just outside the norms of politics but actually detrimental, inimical to democracy in this country by the widest and broadest understanding of it. when we look at where we stand on the democracy index and see our numbers declining and seeing what we consider a flawed democracy, things that are not in dispute, things that are not partisan elements here, the media should approach this with that sort of critical eye.
absolutely true that we re supposed to have a vantage point. what we ve done is mistaken or substituted a kind of even-handedness for neutrality, meaning that you would treat things that are fundamentally dissimilar as if they re the same in the name of objectivity. but what that actually does is normalize the thing that has become unusual. in this case, we ve seen a number of things, an array of things. we could create a catalog of things that are not just outside the norms of politics but actually detrimental, inimical to democracy in this country by the widest and broadest understanding of it. when we look at where we stand on the democracy index and see our numbers declining and seeing what we consider a flawed democracy, things that are not in dispute, things that are not partisan elements here, the media should approach this with that sort of critical eye. that we should not give