Have i want to remind my colleagues once again that this is a tax markup. We have had quite a bit of discussion about the individual mandate and what that might mean for the impact. The individual mandate is part of the tax code. It is well within the intended scope of the market. To rule any amendments that go beyond changes to the Internal Revenue code nongermane. I will rule in nongermane amendments that would put the modified market out of compliance with the committees reconciliation instruction. That we will proceed to the consideration of amendments. We will begin by debating to amendments proposed for 20 minutes. After which we will vote on both amendments. Once we have voted on those we will call on to more amendments proposed by the Ranking Member for 20 minutes and vote on those as well area well. We will see where we are. Wyden the amendments and 146, our5 transparency amendments. Are we have here some of the materials that layout record compiled from the bipartisan 1986 ta
We begin i like remind my colleagues once again that this is a tax markup. Weve had quite a bit of discussion about the individual mandate and what that might mean for the impact of the mark, but even so the individual mandate is part of the tax code. It is by indivisible account well within the intended scope of the markup. I intend to rule in the amendments that go beyond changes to the Internal Revenue code, not germane. Similarly, i will rule nine germane in an image that would put the modified mark out of compliance with the committees reconciliations instruction. With that we will proceed to the consideration of amendments. Where going to begin by debating to amendments proposed by senator wyden for 20 minutes. After which we will vote on both amendments. Once we voted on those amendments we will call on to more amendments proposed by the Ranking Member for 20 minutes and vote on those as well. We will go to that point and then we will see where we are. Okay, senator wyden. Okay.