speech was did somebody say my name? and the answer is no. it s interesting because he said, the president, for the first time in american history, a president, referring to trump, tried to rev prevent a peaceful transfer of power according to the rules of the u.s. constitution. potentially isn t that a crime? absolutely. and the american people are supposed to be able to have an expectation of the peaceful transfer of power, but we also have laws on the books about not interfering we election or trying to do so in any way. that s why you have the courts of law who, when the lawyers for the trump campaign went to the courts and said can i please have relief, the courts rightly said on what basis? where is the evidence to suggest there was any wrongdoing or any reason to grant injunctive relief? there was nothing. then you heard secretary of state brad rath lis berger in that call about find a certain amount of votes, all of these
so what they did here is make this a companion case to the case, the original challenge to this statute that was assigned to judge robert pittman. he was a lawyer in the justice department, a former u.s. attorney, and is now a federal judge. he put that on a fast track when that matter was filed in july. you may recall he scheduled a hearing for the last days of august to make a decision on that case so he could decide to grant injunctive relief when the fifth circuit swooped in, put a stay on his decision, allowing the law to go forward. i think now that it s become in the court of judge pittman he ll look at this and decide there s a and a strong likelihood of irreparable harm. i think there will be a stay, it will be done very quickly, and i think we ll restore abortion rights in texas at least until the supreme court can decide
texas? i think it could happen very quickly. one of the things the justice department did here was take advantage of a local rule that allows parties to identify cases as companion cases to a prior case. they made this a companion case to the case, the original challenge to this statute that was assigned to judge robert pittman. he was a lawyer in the justice department, a former u.s. attorney, and is now a federal judge. he put that on a fast track when that haute was file in the july. you may recall he schedule add a hearing for the last days of august to make a decision on had case so he could decide to grant injunctive relief when the fifth circuit swooped in, put a stay on his decision, allowing the law to go forward. i think now that it s become in the court of judge pittman he ll look at this and decide there s a and a strong