why weren t they called before this hearing anyway? so president trump and top dodt officials, they forged ahead with plans to make a massive amount of national guard troops available. you might remember the previous summer. this is coming off ng the summer o of 500. of 574 offi seventy four official riots in this country where dozensci l americans were killed, whereed thousands of police were injured, wherelice there was o billions of dollars in property damage. so they rightly prop wanted to prepare.th and on january 4th, a meeting took placeen come on in the ovad it featured president trump, his chief of staff, mark meadows, acting defense secretary chris miller, the department of defense chiefc of staff kashhi patel, who will also join us tonightls and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, mark milley, president trump in that meeting requested that up to 20 thousand nationald guard troops be made availableur for security at the capitol for january six as the law requires
0 authoritarian state. that is the destruction of democracy. and we can t let them do it. we re doing our part. thank you for joining us for this hour. have the best evening b with the ones you love.see you we ll see you tomorrow. and welcome to hannity. and we start with the fox news alert breaking tonight . we have all three major broadcast networks, fake news, cnn, msnbc, all happily broadcasting well, the dullest the most boringel. there s absolutely nothingng nothing new . multi hour democratic fundraiser masquerading as a january six hearing. going to and by the sounds of it, they re going to do hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours of t us produced by a former abc executive, 100% hollywood production with all the creative licensesere that wd go along with that. butt make no mistake, tonight s so-called hearing is not in good faith. it is not an honest probe into the security breakdown on that fateful day and we will prove that to tonight instead it is i a made for tv smear
anthony blinken with the increasing complexity and advanced weaponsblin a and p training that s going on and what kind of being we re being lulled into involvement l in thr war and i m afraid that it s t going to get much, much t more obvious in the weeks to come. well,o billions and billionsio and billions of dollars not going to enforcing our border, that s for sure. ornow the state department is s basically echoing what austan said, john, and maybe even a more stark terms swatch. not only will ukraine emerge sovereign and independent when this is over , but moscown wille emerge weaker as long as moscow escalates. we will escalate. this type of aggression can t be repeated. whether that s in days, weeks or months or years from the conclusion of of these hostilities.
world, with about $100 billion to tackle and face up to the climate change challenges they already face but that commitment was made all to be back in 2009. that is why there is a cynicism around the summit, and when you look at the cash, and you are talking about competing against china, there is a patchwork of promises and then targets that they have put out here today, does it cut it when china is out there throwing billions on the table? billions on the table? you re absolutely billions on the table? you re absolutely right. billions on the table? you re absolutely right. go - billions on the table? you re absolutely right. go back- billions on the table? you re absolutely right. go back to | billions on the table? you re - absolutely right. go back to where we started, to judge these summits just on what people have said is clearly not enough. and to take your first point on the climate pledges, absolutely there is were made in 2015 in paris that they would get you 100 billio
and she of course has been sitting on hundreds of millions, maybe even bill kwrops o billions of offshore accounts. the atlantic magazine called hero bama s mitt romney. you would think if the president really meant it about taking on the powerful he would take a good look at her and maybe not appoint her. more to the point the media should be all over it. the media should be saying this is hypocrisy for the president to be denouncing special issues and having attacked mitt romney all through the campaign for his overseas accounts then he hires somebody that has a lot more money than he ever did in her own grand caymen accounts. it was because he talked about one thing and did another. the election he lost because people don t relate to offshore accounts. he might have a point about penny pritsker being on the inside. he was talking about the big money interests that get people elected, citizens united that he didn t mention directly resulted